Get access

Black-market Medicine and Public Opinion Towards the Welfare State: Evidence from Israel

Authors

  • Nissim Cohen,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Public Administration and Policy, The University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
      Dr Nissim Cohen, Department of Public Administration and Policy, The University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel. Email: NissimCohen@poli.haifa.ac.il
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Shlomo Mizrahi,

    1. Department of Public Administration and Policy, The University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Fany Yuval

    1. Department of Public Administration and Policy, The University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
    Search for more papers by this author

Dr Nissim Cohen, Department of Public Administration and Policy, The University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel. Email: NissimCohen@poli.haifa.ac.il

Abstract

Based on a survey and interviews, this article presents and analyses Israeli public opinion toward black-market medicine (BMM) and the welfare state. In addition to providing quantitative and qualitative evidence of the existence of under-the-table payments in Israel, we suggest various insights into this phenomenon. While most citizens admit that they would consider making under-the-table payments in order to receive preferential medical treatment, when the questions mention words such as ‘illegal’ or ‘bribe’, respondents tend to be less tolerant of such activities. We find that, first, there is a basic willingness among Israeli citizens to use BMM. Second, despite this predilection, Israeli citizens are reluctant to articulate their willingness to engage in such illegal activities. This reluctance implies the existence of a moral barrier among the population as far as identifying themselves with illegal behaviour is concerned. We may infer the existence of a gap between declared attitudes and behaviour. Third, the fact that people's willingness to engage in BMM is greater than their willingness to adopt black-market strategies in other areas signifies the special nature of health care. Finally, by connecting the phenomenon of BMM to public opinion regarding the welfare state, we point to a possible gap between normative attitudes and preferences produced by structural conditions.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary