SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Allan, J. P. and Scruggs, L. (2004), Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial countries, American Journal of Political Science, 48, 3: 496512.
  • Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001), Mapping policy preferences: Estimates for parties, governments and electors 1945–1998, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cameron, D. (1978), The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis, American Political Science Review, 72, 4: 124361.
  • Castles, F. G. (1994), Is expenditure enough? On the nature of the dependent variable in comparative public policy analysis, Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 32, 3: 34963.
  • Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2006), Beyond activation: Reforming european unemployment protection systems in post-industrial labour markets, European Societies, 8, 4: 52755.
  • Clayton, R. and Pontusson, J. (1998), Welfare state retrenchment revisited, World Politics, 51, 1: 6798.
  • Cox, R. H. (1998), From safety net to trampoline: Labor market activation in the Netherlands and Denmark, Governance, 11, 4: 397414.
  • Downs, A. (1957), An economic theory of democracy, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Elmelund-Præstekær, C. and Klitgaard, M. B. (2012 forthcoming), Policy or institution? The political choice of retrenchment strategy, Journal of European Public Policy.
  • Elmelund-Præstekær, C., Elklit, J. and Kjaer, U. (2010), The massive stability of the danish multi-party system: A phyrric victory? In K. Lawson (ed.), Political parties and democracy: Europe, Santa Babara, CA: Praeger, pp. 12138.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1985), Politics against markets. The social democratic road to power, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge and Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social foundations of postindustrial economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Green-Pedersen, C. (2001), Welfare-state retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands, 1982–1998: The role of party competition and party consensus, Comparative Political Studies, 34, 9: 96385.
  • Green-Pedersen, C. (2002), The politics of justification. Party competition and welfare-state retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1982 to 1998, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Green-Pedersen, C. (2004), The dependent variable problem within the study of welfare-state retrenchment: Defining the problem and looking for solutions, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 6, 1: 314.
  • Green-Pedersen, C. (2007), The growing importance of issue competition. The changing nature of party competition in western europe, Political Studies, 55, 3: 60828.
  • Hacker, J. S. (2004), Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the united states, American Political Science Review, 98, 2: 24360.
  • Häusermann, S. (2010), Solidarity with whom? Why organised labour is losing ground in continental pension politics, European Journal of Political Research, 49, 2: 22356.
  • Huber, E. and Stephens, J. D. (2001), Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and politics in global markets, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Huber, E., Ragin, C. and Stephens, J. D. (1993), Social democracy, christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state, American Journal of Sociology, 99, 3: 71149.
  • Huber, J. D. and Shipan, C. R. (2000), The costs of control. Legislators, agencies and transaction costs, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 1: 2552.
  • Immergut, E. (1992), The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in france, switzerland and sweden. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (eds),Structuring politics. Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5789.
  • Iversen, T. (2001), The dymamics of welfare state expansion: Trade openness, deindustrialization, and partisan politics. In P. Pierson (ed.), The new politics of the welfare state, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4579.
  • Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2008), Electoral institutions, parties, and the politics of class: Explaining the formation of redistributive coalitions. In C. Anderson and P. Beramendi (eds), Democracy, inequality, and representation: A comparative perspective, New York, NY: Russell Sage, pp. 93126.
  • Jensen, C. (2012), Labor market- versus life course-related social policies. Understanding cross-program differences, Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 2: 27591.
  • Katz, R. and Mair, P. (1994), How parties organize: Change and adaptation in party organizations in western democracies, London: Sage.
  • Keeler, J. T. S. (1993), Opening the window for reform, Comparative Political Studies, 25, 4: 43386.
  • Kitschelt, H. (2001), Partisan competition and welfare state retrenchment. In P. Pierson (ed.), The new politics of the welfare state, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265303.
  • Klitgaard, M. B. (2007), Why are they doing it? Social democracy and market oriented welfare state reforms, West European Politics, 30, 1: 17294.
  • Klitgaard, M. B. (2008), School vouchers and the new politics of the welfare state, Governance, 21, 4: 47998.
  • Korpi, W. (1983), The democratic class struggle, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003), New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95, American Political Science Review, 97, 3: 42546.
  • Kwon, H. Y. and Pontusson, J. (2010), Globalization, labor power and partisan politics revisited, Socio-Economic Review, 8, 2: 25181.
  • Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M. (1994), Who controls? Information and the structure of legislative decision making, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 19, 3: 36184.
  • Manow, P. and van Kersbergen, K. (2009), Religion and the estern welfare state – the theoretical context. In K. van Kersbergen and P. Manow (eds), Religion, class coalitions, and welfare state, Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press, pp. 138.
  • Moe, T. M. (1990), Political institutions: The neglected side of the story, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 6, Special Issue: 21353.
  • Pierson, P. (1994), Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pierson, P. (2001), Coping with permanent austerity: Welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies. In P. Pierson (ed.), The new politics of the welfare state, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41056.
  • Pressman, J. L. and Wildawsky, A. (1973), Implementation: How great expectations in washington are dashed in oakland; or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Ross, F. (2000), ‘Beyond left and right’: The new partisan politics of welfare, Governance, 20, 2: 15583.
  • Rothstein, B. (1996), The social democratic state. The swedish model and the bureaucratic problems of social reforms, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Schmidt, M. G. (1996), When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy, European Journal of Political Research, 30, 2: 15583.
  • Starke, P. (2006), The politics of welfare state retrenchment: A literature review, Social Policy & Administration, 40, 1: 10420.
  • Stephens, J. D. (1979), The transition from capitalism to socialism, London: Macmillan.
  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (2008), The new welfare state settlement in europe, European Societies, 10, 1: 324.
  • Vis, B. (2010), Politics of risk-taking: Welfare state reform in advanced democracies, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Weaver, K. R. (1986), The politics of blame avoidance, Journal of Public Policy, 6, 4: 37198.
  • Weaver, K. R. and Rockman B. A. (1993), Assessing the effects of institutions. In K. R. Weaver and B. A. Rockman (eds), Do institutions matter? Government capabilities in the U.S. and abroad, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 141.