SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alderson, P., Farsides, B., and Williams, C. (2002) Examining ethics in practice: health service professionals’ evaluations of in-hospital ethics seminars, Nursing Ethics, 9, 50821.
  • Allen, D. (1997) The nursing-medical boundary: a negotiated order? Sociology of Health and Illness, 19, 4, 498520.
  • Bauman, Z. (1989) Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bauman, Z (1991) Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Becker, G. (2000) The Elusive Embryo: how Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Braude, P., Pickering, S., Flinter, F., and Ogilvie, C. (2002) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Nature Review Genetics, 3, 94153.
  • Casper, M.J. (1998a) The Making of the Unborn Patient: a Social Anatomy of Fetal Surgery. London: Rutgers University Press.
  • Casper, M.J. (1998b) Negotiations, work objects, and the unborn patient: the interactional scaffolding of fetal surgery, Symbolic Interaction, 21, 4, 379400.
  • Deckers, J. (2005) Why current UK legislation on embryo research is immoral. How the argument from lack of qualities and the argument from potentiality have been applied and why they should be rejected, Bioethics, 19, 3, 25171.
  • Department of Health (2005) Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: a Public Consultation, document reference 26964, accessed via the internet at http://www.dh.gov.uk/publications.
  • De Vries, R. and Conrad, P. (1998) Why bioethics needs sociology. In De Vries, R. and Subedi, J. (eds) Bioethics and Society. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Ehrich, K., Williams, C., Scott, R., Sandall, J., and Farsides, B. (2006) Social welfare, genetic welfare? Boundary work in the IVF/PGD clinic, Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2006, 121324.
  • ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law (2001) The moral status of the pre-implantation embryo, Human Reproduction, 16, 5, 104648.
  • Farsides, B., Williams, C., and Alderson, P. (2005) Aiming towards ‘moral equilibrium’: health care professionals’ views on working within the morally contested field of antenatal screening, Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 5059.
  • Fineman, S. (1993) Introduction to Emotions in Organizations. London: Sage.
  • Franklin, S. (1997) Embodied Progress: a Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
  • Franklin, S. (2006) Embryonic economies: the double reproductive value of stem cells, BioSocieties, 1, 7190.
  • Franklin, S. and Roberts, C. (2001) The Social Life of the Embryo. Dept of Sociology, Lancaster University at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/iht/eofcpaper.htm .
  • Franklin, S. and Roberts, C. (2006) Born and Made: an Ethnography of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Franklin, S., Roberts, C., Braude, P., and Rutherford, T. (2003) Definitions of Genetic Knowledge in the Context of Preimplantation Diagnosis: an Ethnographic Study. End of Award Report (ESRC ref L218252036), Lancaster University.
  • Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Haimes, E. (2002) What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations, Bioethics, 16, 90113.
  • Hochschild, A. (1983) The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Kerr, A. (2004) Genetics and Society: a Sociology of Disease. London: Routledge.
  • Kerr, A. and Cunningham-Burley, S. (2000) On ambivalence and risk: reflexive modernity and the new human genetics, Sociology, 34, 283304.
  • Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., and Tutton, R. (2007) Exploring ambivalence about genetic research and its social context, Social Theory and Health, 5, 1, 5369.
  • Kerr, A. and Franklin, S. (2006) ‘Genetic ambivalence: expertise, uncertainty, and communication in the context of new genetic technologies’ in Webster, A. (ed.) New Technologies in Health Care; Challenge, Change and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Krones, T., Schuter, E., Neuwohner, E., El Ansari, S., Wissner, T., and Richter, G. (2006) What is the preimplantation embryo? Social Science and Medicine, 63, 1, 120.
  • Lavery, S., Aurell, R., Turner, C., Castello, C., Veiga, A., Barri, P., and Winston, R. (2002) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients’ experiences and attitudes, Human Reproduction, 17, 9, 246467.
  • Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. (1984) Analysing Social Settings: a Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont: Wadsworth.
  • Mead, G.H. (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Morgan, L. (2003) Embryo tales. In Franklin, S. and Lock, M. (eds) Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences, Sante Fe: School of American Research Press.
  • Mulkay, M. (1997) The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parker, M. (2000) Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction, Journal of Medical Ethics, 26, 16065.
  • Parry, S. (2003) The politics of cloning: mapping the rhetorical convergence of embryos and stem cells in parliamentary debates, New Genetics and Society, 22, 2, 177200.
  • Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L. (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (eds) Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge.
  • Spallone, P. (1989) Beyond Conception: the New Politics of Reproduction. London: MacMillan Education.
  • Strauss, A.L. (1978) Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order. London: Jossey-Bass.
  • Strauss, A.L., Schatzman, L., Bucher, R., Ehrlich, D. and Sabshin, M. (1964) Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Wainwright, S., Williams, C., Michael, M., Farsides, B., and Cribb, A. (2006) Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory. In De Vries, R. et al. (eds) Special Issue; ‘The View from Here: Bioethics and the Social Sciences’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 6, 73248.
  • Warnock, M. (1985) A Question of Life: The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Warnock, M. (2006) Lost in the moral maze? The Independent, 9 May.
  • Williams, C. (2006) Dilemmas in fetal medicine: premature application of a technology or responding to women's choice? Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 1, 120.
  • Williams, C., Kitzinger, J., and Henderson, L. (2003) Envisaging the embryo in stem cell research: rhetorical strategies and media reporting of the ethical debates, Sociology of Health and Illness, 25, 7, 793814.