SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahmed, S., Green, J.M. and Hewison, J. (2006) Attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for thalassaemia for pregnant Pakistani women in the north of England, Prenatal Diagnosis, 26, 3, 24857.
  • Ali, Z., Fazil, Q., Bywaters, P., Wallace, L. and Singh, G. (2001) Disability, ethnicity and childhood: a critical review of research, Disability and Society, 16, 7, 94968.
  • Bailey, R. (1996) Prenatal testing and the prevention of impairment: a woman's right to choose? In Morris, J. (ed.) Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability. London: Women's Press.
  • Burke, B.M. and Kolker, A. (1993) Clients undergoing chorionic villus sampling versus amniocentesis: Contrasting attitudes toward pregnancy, Health Care for Women International, 14, 2, 193200.
  • Cahill, B.M. and Glidden, L.M. (1996) Influence of child diagnosis on family and parental functioning: Down Syndrome versus other disabilities, American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101, 14960.
  • Calnan, M. (1984) Clinical uncertainty: is it a problem in the doctor-patient relationship? Sociology of Health and Illness, 6, 1, 7485.
  • Cox, S.M. and McKellin, W. (1999) ‘There's this thing in our family’: predictive testing and the construction of risk for Huntington's Disease. In Conrad, P. and Gabe, J. (eds) Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • D’Amico, R., Jacopini, G., Vivona, G. and Frontali, M. (1992) Reproductive choices in couples at risk for genetic disease: a qualitative and quantitative analysis, Birth Defects: Original Article Series, 28, 1, 416.
  • Duster, T. (1990) Backdoor to Eugenics. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Ekberg, M. (2007) Maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks associated with prenatal genetic testing, Health, Risk and Society, 9, 1, 6781.
  • Erikson, S. (2003) Post-diagnostic abortion in Germany: reproduction gone awry? Social Science and Medicine, 56, 9, 19872001.
  • Ettorre, E. (2002) Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body. London: Routledge.
  • Evers-Kierbooms, G., Swerts, A. and Berghe, H. van den (1988) Psychological aspects of amniocentesis: anxiety feelings in three different risk groups, Clinical Genetics, 33, 196206.
  • Ferguson, P.M., Gartner, A. and Lipsky, D.K. (2000) The experience of disability in families: a synthesis of research and parent narratives. In Parens, E. and Asche, A. (eds) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • Franklin, S. and Ragone, H. (eds) (1997) Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Green, J.M., Hewison, J., Bekker, H.L., Bryant, L.D. and Cuckle, H.S. (2004) Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review, Health Technology Assessment, 8, 33, 1124.
  • Haddow, J.E. and Palomaki, G.E. (1996) Similarities in women's decision-making in the U.S. and U.K. during prenatal screening for Down's syndrome, Prenatal Diagnosis, 16, 12, 11612.
  • Hallowell, N. (1999) Doing the right thing: genetic risk and responsibility. In Conrad, P. and Gabe, J. (eds) Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics. London: Blackwell: 97120.
  • Hill, S.A. (1994) Motherhood and the obfuscation of medical knowledge: the case of sickle cell disease, Gender and Society, 8, 1, 2947.
  • Kelly, S. (2002) The ‘new genetics’ meets the old underclass: findings from a study of genetic outreach services in rural Kentucky, Critical Public Health, 12, 2, 16986.
  • Landsman, G. (1998) Reconstructing motherhood in the age of ‘perfect’ babies: Mothers of infants and toddlers with disabilities, Signs, 24, 1, 6999.
  • Landsman, G. (1999) Does God give special kids to special parents? Personhood and the child with disabilities as gift and giver. In Layne, L.L. (ed.) Transformative Motherhood: on Giving and Getting in a Consumer Culture. New York: New York University Press.
  • Landsman, G. (2000) ‘Real motherhood,’ class, and children with disabilities. In Ragone, H. and Twine, F.W. (eds) Ideologies and Technologies of Motherhood: Race, Class, Sexuality, Nationalism. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Landsman, G. (2003) Emplotting children's lives: Developmental delay vs. disability, Social Science and Medicine, 56, 194760.
  • Landsman, G. (2005) Mothers and models of disability, Journal of Medical Humanities, 26, 2/3, 12139.
  • Lippman, A. (1991) Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and enforcing inequalities. American Journal of Law and Medicine, XVII, 1 and 2, 1550.
  • Mansfield, C., Hopfer, S. and Marteau, T.M. (1999) Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review. European Concerted Action: DADA (Decision-making After the Diagnosis of a fetal Abnormality), Prenatal Diagnosis, 19, 9, 80812.
  • Markens, S., Browner, C.H. and Press, N. (1999) ‘Because of the risks’: how US pregnant women account for refusing prenatal screening, Social Science and Medicine, 49, 35969.
  • Marteau, T. and Croyle, R. (1998) Psychological responses to genetic testing, British Medical Journal, 316, 69396.
  • Mutton, D., Ide, R. and Alberman, E. (1998) Trends in prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down's syndrome: England and Wales, 1989–97, British Medical Journal, 317, 7163, 9223.
  • Parens, E. and Asch, A. (eds) (2000) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • Patteson, A. and Satz, M. (2002) Genetic counseling and the disabled: Feminism examines the stance of those who stand at the gate, Hypatia, 17, 3, 11842.
  • Press, N. and Browner, C.H. (1997) Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis, Social Science and Medicine, 45, 7, 97989.
  • Rapp, R. (1990) Constructing Amniocentesis: maternal and medical discourses. In Ginsburg, F. and Tsing, A.L. (eds) Uncertain Terms: Negotiating Gender in America. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Rapp, R. (1998) Refusing prenatal diagnosis: the uneven meaning of bioscience in a multicultural world, Science, Technology and Human Values, 23, 4570.
  • Rapp, R. (1999) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: the Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
  • Rapp, R. and Ginsberg, F. (2002) Standing at the crossroads of genetic testing: new eugenics, disability consciousness, and women's work, GeneWatch, 15, 1 (available at http://www.gene-watch.org/genewatch/articles/15-1crossroads.html).
  • Rothenberg, K. and Thomson, E.J. (eds) (1994) Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Testing. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
  • Roelofsen, E., Kamerbeek, L. and Tymstra, T. (1993) Chances and choices. Psycho-social consequences of maternal serum screening. A report from the Netherlands, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 11, 417.
  • Rothman, B.K. (1993) The Tentative Pregnancy: how Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
  • Salonen, R., Kurki, L. and Lappalainen, M. (1996) Experiences of mothers participating in maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome, European Journal of Human Genetics, 4, 2, 11319.
  • Sandelowski, M. and Jones, L.C. (1996) ‘Healing fictions’: Stories of choosing in the aftermath of the detection of fetal anomalies, Social Science and Medicine, 42, 3, 35361.
  • Santalahti, P., Latikka, A-M., Ryynänen, M. and Hemminki, E. (1996) Women's experiences of prenatal serum screening, Birth, 23, 1017.
  • Shakespeare, T. (1999) ‘Losing the plot’? Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disability, Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 66988.
  • Sloper, T. and Beresford, B. (2006) Families with disabled children, British Medical Journal, 333, 9289.
  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Viisainen, K. (2000). The moral dangers of home birth: parents’ perceptions of risks in home birth in Finland, Sociology of Health and Illness, 22, 6, 792814.
  • Webster, A. (2002) Risk and innovative health technologies: calculation, interpretation and regulation, Health, Risk and Society, 4, 3,
  • Wertz, D.C., Rosenfield, J.M., Janes, S.R. and Erbe, R.W. (1991) Attitudes toward abortion among parents of children with cystic fibrosis, American Journal of Public Health, 81, 8, 9926.