SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bryman, A. (2001) Social Research Methods Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chattopadhyay, S. (2006) ‘Rakter dosh’– corrupting blood: the challenges of preventing thalassemia in Bengal, India, Social Science and Medicine, 63, 266173.
  • Corea, C. (1985) The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to the Artificial Womb. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Delphy, C. (1992) Mothers’ Union? Trouble and Strife, 24, 1219.
  • Draper, J. (2002) ‘It was a real good show’: the ultrasound scan, fathers and the power of visual knowledge, Sociology of Health and Illness, 24, 6, 77195.
  • Earle, S. and Letherby, G. (2007) Conceiving time? Women who do or do not conceive, Sociology of Health and Illness 29, 2, 23350.
  • Ettorre, E. (2002) Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body. London: Routledge.
  • Ettorre, E. (2000) Reproductive genetics, gender and the body: ‘Please doctor, may I have a normal baby?’ Sociology, 34, 3, 40320.
  • Finger, A. (1990) Past Due: a Story of Disability, Pregnancy and Childbirth. London: The Women's Press.
  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
  • Green, J.M., Hewison, J., Bekker, H.L., Bryant, L.D. and Cuckle, H.S. (2004) Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review, Health Technology Assessment, 8, 33.
  • Green, J.M. (1994) Serum screening for Down's syndrome: experiences of obstetricians in England and Wales, British Medical Journal, 309, 76972.
  • Hewlett, B. (1991) Intimate Fathers: the Nature and Context of Aka Pygmy Paternal Infant Care. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Hirsch, E. (1993) Negotiated limits: interviews in south-east England. In Edwards, J. et al . (eds) Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
  • Ivry, T. (2007). Embodied responsibilities: pregnancy in the eyes of Japanese ob-gyns, Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 2, 25174.
  • Jordan, P.L. (1990) Laboring for relevance: expectant and new fatherhood, Nursing Research, 39, 1116.
  • LaRossa, R. (1997) The Modernization of Fatherhood: a Social and Political History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lazarus, E. (1994) What do women want? Issues of choice, control and class in pregnancy and childbirth, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 8, 2546.
  • Locock, L. and Alexander, J. (2006) ‘Just a bystander?’ Men's place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis, Social Science and Medicine, 62, 6, 134959
  • Markens, S., Browner, C.H. and Press, N. (1997). Feeding the fetus: on interrogating the notion of maternal-fetal conflict, Feminist Studies, 23, 2, 35172.
  • Markens, S., Browner, C.H. and Preloran, H.M. (2003) ‘I'm not the one they’re sticking the needle into’: Latino couples, fetal diagnosis, and the discourse of reproductive rights, Gender and Society, 17, 3: 46281.
  • NHS Choices : Antenatal Screening  http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Antenatal-screening (accessed 2008).
  • NHS Antenatal and Newborn Screening Programme: Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia  http://www.sct.screening.nhs.uk/Documents/MidwivesInfo.pdf (accessed 2008).
  • NHS Downs Syndrome Prevention  http://www.nhsdirect.com  (accessed 2008).
  • Oakley, A. (1981) Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. In Roberts, H. (ed.) Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge.
  • Petchesky, R. (1984) Abortion and Woman's Choice: the State, Sexuality and Reproductive Freedom. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  • Pilnick, A. (2002) Genetics and Society: an Introduction. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Pilnick, A. (2004) ‘It's just one of the best tests that we've got at the moment’: the presentation of nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality in pregnancy, Discourse and Society, 15, 4, 45165.
  • Press, N. and Browner, C.H. (1997) Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis, Social Science and Medicine, 45, 7, 97989.
  • Rapp, R. (2000) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus. London: Routledge.
  • Reed, K. (2006) New Directions in Social Theory: Race, Gender and the Canon. London: Sage.
  • Reed, K. (2007a) Bureaucracy and beyond: the impact of ethical review and research governance on health research in the social sciences, Sociological Research Online, 12, 5, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/18.html>.
  • Reed, K. (2007b) Antenatal screening and the gendering of genetic responsibility, Reproductive Health 4:8 <http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/4/1/8>.
  • Robinson, V. (2008) Men, masculinities and feminism. In Richardson, D. and Robinson, V. (eds) Introducing Women's Studies: Feminist Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Rothman, B.K. (1986) The Tentative Pregnancy: how Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood. New York: Norton.
  • Rothman, B.K. (1995) Of maps and imaginations: sociology confronts the genome, Social Problems, 42, 110.
  • Rose, H. (1987) Victorian values in a test-tube: the politics of reproductive science and technology. In Stanworth, M. (ed.) Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Rowe, R.E. and Garcia, J. (2003) Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review, Journal of Public Health Medicine, 25, 2, 11319.
  • Sandelowski, M. (1994) Separate but less unequal: fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood, Gender and Society, 8, 23045.