SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Appelbaum, P.S., Roth, L.H., Lidz, C.W., Benson, P. and Winslade, W. (1987) False hopes and best data — consent to research and the therapeutic misconception, Hastings Center Report, 17, 2, 204.
  • Andrews, F.J. (2001) Pain during mammography: implications for breast screening programmes, Australasian Radiology, 45, 1137.
  • Borrayo, E.A. and Jenkins, S.R. (2001) Feeling indecent: breast cancer screening resistance of Mexican-descent women, Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 5, 53749.
  • British Psychological Society (2000). Code of Conduct, Ethical Principles and Guidelines. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
  • Burman, E. and Parker, I. (1993) Introduction—discourse analysis: The turn to text. In Burman, E. and Parker, I. (eds) Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action. London: Routledge.
  • Bruyninckx, E., Mortelmans, D., Van Goethem, M. and Van Hove, E. (1999) Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening, Social Science and Medicine, 49, 93341.
  • Corrigan, O. (2002) First in man: the politics and ethics of women in clinical drug trials, Feminist Review, 72, 4052.
  • Corrigan, O. (2003) Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent, Sociology of Health and Illness, 25, 3, 76892.
  • Cox, K. (1999) Researching research: patients’ experiences of participation in phase I and II anti-cancer drug trials, European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 3, 3, 14352.
  • DoH/Department of Health (2001) Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. London: Department of Health.
  • Doyle, C.A. and Stanton, M.T. (2002) Significant factors in patient satisfaction ratings of screening mammography, Radiography, 8, 15972.
  • Edwards, S.J.L., Lilford, R.J. and Hewison, J. (1998) The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public and healthcare professionals, British Medical Journal, 317, 7167, 120912.
  • Entwistle, V.A., Renfrew, M.J., Yearley, S., Forrester, J. and Lamont, T. (1998) Lay perspectives: advantages for health research, British Medical Journal, 316, 7129, 4636.
  • Epstein, S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Epstein, S. (2004) Bodily differences and collective identities: the politics of gender and race in biomedical research in the United States, Body and Society, 10, 203, 183203.
  • Fallowfield, L.J., Rodway, A. and Baum, M. (1990) What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 83, 54751.
  • Gill, R. (2000) Discourse analysis. In Bauer, M. and Gaskell, G. (eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage.
  • Goodare, H. and Lockwood, S. (1999) Involving patients in clinical research, British Medical Journal, 319, 7245.
  • Grosz, E. (1994) Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Hafslund, B. (2000) Mammography and the experience of pain and anxiety, Radiography, 6, 26972.
  • Hanley, B., Truesdale, A., King, A., Elbourne, D. and Chalmers, I. (2001) Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey, British Medical Journal, 322, 7285, 51923.
  • Howson, A. (1999) Cervical screening, compliance and moral obligation, Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 4, 40125.
  • Iredale, R., Brain, K., Williams, B., France, E. and Gray, J. (2006) The experience of men with breast cancer in the United Kingdom, European Journal of Cancer, 42, 3, 33441.
  • Klawiter, M. (2008) The Biopolitics of Breast Cancer: Changing Cultures of Disease and Activism. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Lowton, K. (2005) Trials and Tribulations: understanding motivations for clinical research participants amongst adults with cystic fibrosis, Social Science and Medicine, 61, 185465.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan-Paul.
  • Miles, A. (1991) Women, health, and medicine. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Miller, D., Livingstone, V. and Herbison, P. (2008) Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography (Review), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1, Article no: CD002942.
  • Morris, N. and Balmer, B. (2006) Volunteer human subjects’ understanding of their participation in a biomedical research experiment, Social Science and Medicine, 62, 4, 9981008.
  • Morris, N. and Schneider, M. (in press) Volunteer research subjects’ experience of participation in research on a novel diagnostic technology for breast cancer, Qualitative Health Research.
  • Perkins, G.H. and Middleton, L.P. (2003) Breast cancer in men, British Medical Journal, 327, 7409, 23940.
  • Potts, L.K. (2000) Ideology of Breast Cancer: Feminist Perspectives. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
  • Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
  • Saywell, C., With Beattie, L. and Henderson, L. (2000) Sexualised illness: the newsworthy body in media representations of breast cancer. In Potts, L.K. (ed.) Ideologies of Breast Cancer: Feminist Perspectives. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
  • Shildrick, M. and Mykitiuk, R. (2005) Ethics of the Body: Postconventional Challenges. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Shuhatovich, O.M., Sharman, M.P., Mirabal, Y.N., Earle, N.R., Follen, M. and Basen-Engquist, K. (2005) Participant recruitment and motivation for participation in optical technology for cervical cancer screening research trials, Gynecologic Oncology, 99, S226S231.
  • Snowdon, C., Garcia, J. and Elbourne, D. (1997) Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial, Social Science and Medicine, 45, 9, 133755.
  • Sontag, S. (19781990) Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and its Metaphors. New York: Doubleday.
  • Stacey, J. (1997) Teratologies: a Cultural Study of Cancer. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Weinstein, M. (2001) A public culture for guinea pigs: US human research subjects after the Tuskegee study, Science as Culture, 10, 2, 195223.
  • Wilkinson, S. (2000) Feminist research traditions in health psychology: breast cancer research, Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 3, 35972.
  • Williams, S. (2002) Corporeal reflections on the biological: reductionism, constructionism and beyond. In Bendelow, G., Carpenter, M., Vautier, C. and Williams, S. (eds) Gender, Health and Healing: The Public/Private Divide. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Williams, B.G., Iredale, R., Brain, K., France, E., Barrett-Lee, P. and Gray, J. (2003) Experiences of men with breast cancer: an exploratory focus group study, British Journal of Cancer, 89, 10, 18346.
  • Williamson, C. (2001) What does involving consumers in research mean? QJM, 94, 12, 6614.
  • Willis, K. (2004) Personal choice/social responsibility: women aged 40–49 years and mammography screening, Journal of Sociology, 40, 2, 12136.