SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barnard, A. (2002) Philosophy of technology and nursing, Nursing Philosophy, 3, 1, 1526.
  • Barratt, J. (2005) A case study of styles of patient self-presentation in the nurse practitioner primary health care consultation, Primary Health Care Research and Development, 6, 32738.
  • Beach, W. and Dixson, C. (2001) Revealing moments: formulating understandings of adverse experiences in a health appraisal interview, Social Science and Medicine, 52, 2544.
  • Berg, M. (1996) Practices of reading and writing: the constitutive role of the patient record in medical work, Sociology of Health and Illness, 18, 4, 499524.
  • Berg, M. and Bowker, G. (1997) The multiple bodies of the medical record: toward a sociology of an artifact, Sociology Quarterly, 38, 51135.
  • Boyd, E. and Heritage, J. (2006) Taking the history: questioning during comprehensive history-taking. in Heritage, J. and Maynard, D. (eds) Communication in Medical Care. Studies in interactional Sociolinguistics 20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Collins, S., Britten, N., Thompson, A. and Ruusuvuori, J. (eds) (2007) Patient Participation in Healthcare Consultations. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Crawford, P. and Brown, B. (2004) Communication. In Mallick, M, Hall, C. and Howard, D. (eds) Nursing Knowledge and Practice Foundations for Decision Making. 2nd Edition. London: Balliere Tindall.
  • Currell, R. and Urquhart, M. (2004) Nursing Record Systems: Effects on Nursing Practice and Health Care Outcomes. The Cochrane Library. Issue 4.
  • Darbyshire, P. (2004) ‘Rage against the machine?’: Nurses’ and midwives’ experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 1, 1725.
  • Dougherty, L. and Lister, S. (2004) The Royal Marsden Manual of Clinical Nursing Procedures. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Dougherty, L. and Lister, S. (2008) The Royal Marsden Manual of Clinical Nursing Procedures. Student Edition Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1992) Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hak, T. (1992) Psychiatric records as transformation of other texts. In Watson, G. and Seiler, R. (eds) Text in Context. Contributions in Ethnomethodology.Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Harris, R., Wilson-Barnett, J., Griffiths, P. and Evans, A. (1998) Patient assessment: validation of a nuring instrument, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 35, 30313.
  • Ten Have, P. (2004) Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
  • Heath, C. (1986) Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heath, C. and Hindmarsh, J. (2002) Analyzing interaction: video, ethnography and situated conduct. In May, Y. (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage.
  • Heath, C., Luff, P. and Sanchez Svenson, M. (2003) Technology and medical practice, Sociology of Health and Illness, 25, 3, 7596.
  • Heritage, J. and Stivers, T. (1999) Online commentary in acute medical visits: a method of shaping patient expectations, Social Science and Medicine, 49, 150117.
  • HES (2007) Headline Figures 2006-07. Accessed 18th July 2008 from http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=193.
  • Jefferson, G. (1972) Side sequences. In Sudnow, D.N. (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Jefferson, G. (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. in Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds) Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kaner, E., Heaven, B., Rapley, T., et al. (2007) Medical technology and communication: a video based process study of the use of decision aids in primary care consultations, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7, 2, 111.
  • King, I. (1971) Toward a Theory of Nursing: General Concepts of Human Behaviour. New York: Wiley.
  • Kirshbaum, M. (2004) Are we ready for the electronic patient record? Attitude and perceptions from staff from two NHS trust hospitals, Health Informatics Journal, 10, 4, 265276.
  • Latimer, J. (2000) The Conduct of Care. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Lee, T. (2005) Nurses’ concerns about using information systems: analysis of comments on a computerized nursing care plan system in Taiwan, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14, 34453.
  • Lee, T. (2006) Nurses’ perceptions of their documentation experiences in a computerized nursing care planning system, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 11, 137682.
  • Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Maynard, D. and Schaeffer, N.C. (2006) Standardisation-in-interaction. The survey interview. In Drew, P., Raymond, G. and Weinberg, D. (eds) Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London: Sage.
  • McGrath, J., Arar, N. and Pugh, J. (2007) The influence of electronic medical record usage on non verbal communication in the medical interview, Health Informatics Journal, 1, 32, 11518.
  • Moloney, R. and Maggs, C. (1999) A systematic review of the relationships between written manual nursing care planning, record keeping and patient outcomes, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 517.
  • Newman, J. and Vidler, E. (2006) Discriminating customers, responsible patients, empowered users: consumerism and the modernisation of health care, Journal of Social Policy, 35, 2, 193209.
  • NHS Executive (1996) Patient Partnership: Building a Collaborative Strategy. Leeds: NHS Executive.
  • Nursing and Midwifery Council (2007) Record Keeping. Accessed 21/04/09 from http://www.nmc-uk.org/aDisplayDocument.aspx?documentID=4008.
  • Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008) The Code: Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives. London: NMC.
  • Peräkylä, A. and Vehviläinen, S. (2003) Conversational analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge, Discourse and Society, 14, 6, 72750.
  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. in Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rhodes, P., Langdon, M., Rowley, E., et al. (2006) What does the use of a computerised checklist mean for patient-centred care? The example of a routine diabetes review, Qualitative Health Research, 16, 35378.
  • Rodrigues, J. (2001) The complexity of developing a nursing information system: a Brazilian experience, Computers in Nursing, 19, 98104.
  • Royal College of Nursing (2003) Defining Nursing. London: Royal College of Nursing.
  • Ruusuvuori, J. (2001) Looking means listening: coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction, Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1093198.
  • Sahlsten, M., Larsson, I., Sjöström, B. and Kaety, P. (2008) An analysis of the concept of patient participation, Nursing Forum, 43, 1, 211.
  • Silverman, D. (2005) Doing Qualitative Research. A Practical Handbook. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
  • Sully, P. and Dallas, J. (2005) Essential Communication Skills for Nursing. Edinburgh: Elsevier Mosby.
  • Timmermans, S. and Berg, M. (2003) The practice of medical technology. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25, 3, 97114.
  • Tutton, E. (2005) Patient participation on a ward for frail older people, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50, 2, 14352.
  • Ventres, W., Kooienga, S., Vuckovic, N., et al. (2006) Physicians, patients and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis, Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 2, 12431.
  • Welsh Assembly Government (2003) Putting Patient and Public Involvement into Practice. Signposts 2. London: OPM.
  • WHO (2005) Health promotion in Hospitals: Evidence and quality management. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation.
  • Woofitt, R. and Widdicombe, S. (2006) Interaction in interviews. In Drew, P., Raymond, G. and Weinberg, D. (eds) Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London: Sage.