SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abel, E. and Browner, C.H. (1998) Selective compliance with biomedical authority and the uses of experiential knowledge. In Lock, M. and Kaufert, P. (eds) Pragmatic Women and Body Politic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2007) Practice Bulletin 77. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109, 21726.
  • Armstrong, E.M. (2003) Conceiving Risk, Bearing Responsibility: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and the Diagnosis of a Moral Disorder. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Atkin, K., Ahmed, S., Hewison, J. and Green, J.M. (2008) Decision-making and ante-natal screening for sickle cell and thalassaemia disorders, Current Sociology, 56, 7798.
  • Barker, K.K. (1998) A ship upon a stormy sea: the medicalization of pregnancy, Social Science and Medicine, 47, 106776.
  • Beeson, D. and Doksum, T. (2001) Family values and resistance to genetic testing. In Hoffmaster, B. (ed.) Bioethics In Social Context. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Blum, L.M. (1999) At the Breast: Ideologies of Breastfeeding and Motherhood in the Contemporary United States. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Browner, C. H. (2000) Situating women’s reproductive activities, American Anthropologist, 102, 773788.
  • Browner, C.H. and Press, N. (1995) The normalization of prenatal diagnostic testing. In Ginsburg, F. and Rapp, R. (eds) The Politics of Reproduction: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Browner, C.H. and Press, N. (1996) The production of authoritative knowledge in American prenatal care, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 19, 14156.
  • Browner, C.H., Preloran, H.M. and Cox, S.J. (1999) Ethnicity, bioethics, and prenatal diagnosis: the amniocentesis decisions of Mexican-origin women and their partners, American Journal of Public Health, 89, 165866.
  • California Department of Health Services (1998) Genetic Disease Branch. The California Alpha-Fetoprotein Screening Program. Unpublished manuscript, Berkeley.
  • California, State of (2007) Genetic Disease Screening Program: Fact Sheet. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/CenterForFamilyHealth/Pages/GDSPFactSheet.aspx.
  • Clarke, A., Shim, J.K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J.R. and Fishman, J.R. (2003) Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine, American Sociological Review, 68, 16194.
  • Conrad, P. (2005) The shifting engines of medicalization, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 314.
  • Cunningham, G.C. (1998) An Evaluation of California’s Public-Private Maternal Serum Screening Program. Ninth International Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Davis-Floyd, R. (1992) Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Davis-Floyd, R. and Sargent, C.F. (eds) (1997) Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Dolev, Y.H. (2007) Life (Un)Worthy of Living: Reproductive Genetics in Israel and Germany. New York: Springer.
  • Duster, T. (1990) Backdoor to Eugenics. New York: Routledge.
  • Ehrenreich, B. and English, D. (1978) For Her Own Good: 150 Years of Experts Advice to Women. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Ettore, E. (2002) Reproductive Genetics, Gender, and the Body. New York: Routledge.
  • Farrant, W. (1985) Who’s for amniocentesis? The politics of prenatal screening. In Homans, H. (ed.) The Sexual Politics of Reproduction. Aldershot: Gower.
  • Fox, B. and Worts, D. (1999) Revisiting the critique of medicalized childbirth: a contribution to the sociology of birth, Gender and Society, 13, 32646.
  • Gammeltoft, T. (2007) Prenatal diagnosis in postwar Vietnam: power, subjectivity, and citizenship, American Anthropologist, 109, 15363.
  • Garcia, E., Timmermans, D.R.M. and Van Leeuwen, E. (2008) The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification, Social Science and Medicine, 66, 75364.
  • Georges, E. and Mitchell, L. (2000) Baby talk: the rhetorical production of maternal and fetal selves. In Lay, M., Gurak, L., Gravon, C. and Myntti, C. (eds) Body Talk: Rhetoric, Technology, Reproduction. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Gerber, E.G. (2002) Deconstructing pregnancy: RU486, seeing ‘eggs’, and the ambiguity of very early conceptions, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 16, 92108.
  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Green, J.M., Hewison, J., Bekker, H.L., Bryant, L.D. and Cuckle, H.S. (2004) Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review, Health Technology Assessment, 8, 33.
  • Hays, S. (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale.
  • Ivry, T. (2007) Embodied responsibilities: pregnancy in the eyes of Japanese Ob-Gyns, Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 2, 25174.
  • Ivry, T. and Teman, E. (2008) Expectant Israeli fathers and the medicalized pregnancy: ambivalent compliance and critical pragmatism, Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 32, 35885.
  • Jordan, B. (1993) [1978] Birth in Four Cultures: a cross-cultural investigation of childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden and the United States, 4th Edition. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Kelly, S.E. (2009) Choosing not to choose: reproductive responses of parents of children with genetic conditions or impairments, Sociology of Health and Illness, 31, 1, 9197.
  • Ketler, S.K. (2000) Preparing for motherhood: authoritative knowledge and the undercurrents of shared experience in two childbirth education courses in Cagliari, Italy, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 142, 13858.
  • Kupperman, M., et al. (2006) Beyond race or ethnicity and socioeconomic status: predictors of prenatal testing for Down Syndrome, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 107, 108797.
  • Lazarus, E. S. (1994) What do women want? Issues of choice, control, and class in pregnancy and childbirth, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 8, 2546.
  • Lippman, A. (1999) Embodied knowledge and making sense of prenatal diagnosis, Journal of Genetic Counseling, 8, 25574.
  • Litt, J.S. (2000) Medicalized Motherhood: Perspectives from the Lives of African-American and Jewish Women. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Markens, S., Browner, C.H. and Preloran, H.M. (2003) ‘I’m not the one they’re sticking the needle into’: Latino couples, fetal diagnosis and the discourse of reproductive rights, Gender and Society, 17, 46281.
  • Markens, S., Browner, C.H. and Press, N. (1997) Feeding the fetus: on interrogating the notion of maternal-fetal conflict, Feminist Studies, 23, 35172.
  • Markens, S., Browner, C.H. and Press, N. (1999) ‘Because of the risks’: how US pregnant women account for refusing prenatal screening, Social Science and Medicine, 49, 35969.
  • Martin, E. (1987) The Woman in the Body: a Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • McNeil, M. and Litt, J. (1992) More medicalizing of mothers: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome in the USA and related developments. In Scott, S., Williams, G., Platt, S. and Thomas, H. (eds) Private Risks and Public Dangers. Portland, OR: Book News, Inc.
  • Mitchell, L.M. (2001) Baby’s First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Mitchell, L.M. and Georges, E. (1997) Cross-cultural cyborgs: Greek and Canadian women’s discourses on fetal ultrasound, Feminist Studies, 23, 373401.
  • Oakely, A. (1984) The Captured Womb: a History of the Medical Care of Pregnant Women. London: Blackwell.
  • Oaks, L. (2001) Smoking and Pregnancy: the Politics of Fetal Protection. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Obermeyer, C.M. (2000) Pluralism and pragmatism: knowledge and practice of birth in Morocco, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 14, 180201.
  • Preloran, M.H., Browner, C.H. and Leiber, E. (2001) Strategies for motivating Latino couples’ participation in qualitative health research, American Journal of Public Health, 91, 183241.
  • Press, N. and Browner, C.H. (1997) Why women say yes to prenatal screening, Social Science and Medicine, 45, 97989.
  • Rapp, R. (1999) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: the Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
  • Remennic, L. (2006) The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing? Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 1, 2153.
  • Root, R. and Browner, C.H. (2001) Practices of the pregnant self: compliance with and resistance to biomedical prenatal norms, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 25, 195223.
  • Rothman, B.K. (1984) The meanings of choice in reproductive technology. In Arditti, R., Klein, R.D. and Minden, S. (eds) Test-tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? Boston: Pandora Press.
  • Rothman, B.K. (1986) The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. NY: Viking Penguin.
  • Schaffer, R., Kuczynski, K. and Skinner, D. (2008) Producing genetic knowledge and citizenship through the internet: mothers, pediatric genetics, and cybermedicine, Sociology of Health and Illness, 30, 1, 14559.
  • Scrimshaw, S.C.M., Zambrana, R.E. and Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1997) Issues in Latino women’s health: myths and challenges. In Ruzek, S.B, Olesen, V. and Clarke, A. (eds) Women’s Health: Complexities and Differences. Columbus: Ohio University Press.
  • Shaw, I. (2002) How lay are lay beliefs?, Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of HealthIllness and Medicine, 6, 28799.
  • Taylor, J.S. (2008) The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption, and the Politics of Reproduction. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • Teman, E. (2003). Knowing the surrogate body in Israel’. In Cook, R., and Schlater, S.D. (eds), Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives. London: Hart Press.
  • Terry, J. (1989) The body invaded: medical surveillance of women as reproducers, Socialist Review, 19, 1343.
  • Vassy, C. (2006) From genetic innovation to mass health programmes: the diffusion of Down’s Syndrome prenatal screening and diagnostic techniques in France, Social Science and Medicine, 63, 204151.
  • Williams, C, Alderson, P. and Farsides, B. (2002) Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening Social Science and Medicine, 55, 74353.