SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akrich, M. (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Binstock, R.E. and Chuff, L.E. (2000) Home Care Advances: Essential Research and Policy Issues. New York: Springer.
  • Burke, C. (2009) Observations on health care reform: thinking long-term, Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government Report. http://www.rockinst.org/observations/burkec/2009-03 health_care_reform_thinking_long_term.aspx
  • Calasanti, T. and Slevin, K. (2006) Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. New York: Routledge.
  • Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Charness, N. (2003) Commentary: access, motivation, ability, design and training: necessary conditions for older adult success with technology. In Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Cowan, R.S. (1983) More Work for Mother: the Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.
  • Cruikshank, M. (2003) Learning to Be Old: Gender, Culture and Aging. New York: Roman and Littlefield.
  • DeVault, M.L. (1991) Feeding the Family, the Social Organisation of Caring as Gendered Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gubrium, J.F. and Holstein, J.A. (2000) Introduction, Aging and Everyday Life. New York: Blackwell.
  • Gitlin, L.N. (2003) Commentary: next steps in home modification and assistive technology research. In Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging, New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Gutman, G.M. (2003) Commentary: Gerontechnology and the home environment. In Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Hardy, M. (2003) Is it all about aging? Technology and aging in social context. In Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • He, W., Sengupta, M., Velkoff, V.A. and DeBarros, K.A. (2005) U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P23-209, 65+ in the United States: 2005, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  • Humphreys, J. (2007) Upstate New York Regional Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2, 2, 1.
  • Joyce, K. and Mamo, L. (2006) Graying the cyborg: new directions in feminist analyses of aging, science, and technology. In Calasanti, T. and Slevin, K. (eds) Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. NY: Routledge.
  • Joyce, K., Williamson, J. and Mamo, L. (2007) Technology, science, and ageism: an examination of three patterns of discrimination, Indian Journal of Gerontology, 21, 2, 11027.
  • Kaufman, S.R. (1986) The Ageless Self: Sources of Meaning in Late Life. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Kline, R. and Pinch, T. (1996) Users as agents of technological change: the social construction of the automobile in the rural United States, Technology and Culture, 37, 4, 76395.
  • Kontos, P.K. (2000) Resisting institutionalization: constructing old age and negotiating home. In Gubrium, J.F. and Holstein, J.A. (eds) Aging and Everyday Life. NY: Blackwell.
  • Loe, M. (2004) The Rise of Viagra: How the Little Blue Pill Changed Sex in America. New York: New York University Press.
  • Lawton, M.P. (1990) Aging and performance on home tasks. Human Factors, 32, 52736.
  • Mann, W.C. (2003) Assistive technology. In Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Martin, M. (1991) Hello Central? Gender, Technology and Culture in the Formation of Telephone Systems. Montreal: Mc-Gill Queens University Press.
  • McGaw, J.A. (2003) Why feminine technologies matter. In Lerman, N.E., Oldenziel, R. and Mohun, A.P. (eds) Gender and Technology: a Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Moore, A.J. and Stratton, D.C. (2002) Resilient Widowers: Older Men Speak for Themselves. New York: Springer.
  • Moore, L.J. (2007) Sperm Counts: Overcome by Man’s Most Precious Fluid. New York: NewYork University Press.
  • Morrow, D. (2003) Commentary: technology as environmental support for older adults' daily activities. In Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • O’Rand, A.M. (2002) Cumulative advantage theory in lifecourse research, Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 22, 1420.
  • Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (2005). How Users Matter: the Co-Construction of Users and Technology (Inside Technology). Boston: MIT Press.
  • United States Census Bureau (2005) 65+ in the United States, Current Population Reports.
  • Wahl, H. and Mollenkopf, H. (2003) Impact of everyday technology in the home environment on older adults’ quality of life, In Charness, N. and Schaie, K.W. (eds) Impact of Technology on Successful Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Wajcman, J. (1991) Feminists Confront Technology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • West, C. and Zimmerman, D.H. (1987) Doing gender, Gender and Society, 1, 2, 12551.
  • Woolgar, S. (1991) The turn to technology in social studies of science, Science, Technology and Human Values, 16, 1, 2050.