SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anspach, R. (1993) Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive-Care Nursery. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • ASRM (2009) Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians and unmarried persons, Fertility and Sterility, 19, 4, 119093.
  • Banks, S., Leach-Scully, J. and Shakespeare, T. (2006). Ordinary ethics: lay people’s deliberations on social sex-selection, New Genetics and Society, 25, 3, 289303.
  • Benson, A., Cribb, A. and Barber, N. (2009) Understanding pharmacists’ values: a qualitative study of dilemmas and values in UK pharmacy practice, Social Science and Medicine, 68, 12, 222330.
  • Blyth, E. and Frith, L. (2009) Donor conceived peoples’ access to genetic and biographical history, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 23, 2, 17491.
  • Bosk, C. (1992) All God’s Mistakes: Genetic Counselling in a Pediatric Hospital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Braunack-Mayer, A. (2001) Casuistry as bioethical method: an empirical perspective, Social Science and Medicine, 53, 7181.
  • Braunack-Mayer, A. (2005) What makes a good GP? An empirical perspective on virtue in general practice, Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 827.
  • Bravo, G., Paquet, M. and Dubois, M.-F. (2003) Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research, Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 4450.
  • British Fertility Society (2006) NHS Funding of Assisted Conception. London: BFS.
  • Brock, D. (1987) Truth or consequences: the role of philosophers in policy making, Ethics, 97, 4, 78691.
  • Bryman, A. (2001) Social Science Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Caplan, A. (1988) The new technologies in reproduction: new ethical problems, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 530, 1, 7382.
  • Clarke, E. (1990) Controversey and the development of reproductive science, Social Problems, 37, 1, 1837.
  • Cribb, A. (2005) Health and the Good Society: Setting Healthcare Ethics in Social Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Cussins, C. (1998) Producing reproduction: techniques of normalization and naturalization in infertility clinics. In Franklin, S. and Ragone, H. (eds) Reproducing Reproduction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Donovan, C. (1993) Keeping it in the Family: an Analysis of Doctors’ Decision-making about Access in the Provision of Donor Insemination. PhD, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
  • Ehrich, K., Williams, C., Scott, R., Sandall, J. and Farsides, B. (2006) Social welfare, genetic welfare? Boundary work in the IVF/PGD clinic, Social Science and Medicine, 63, 5, 121324.
  • English, V. (2005) Egg sharing affects the validity of woman’s consent, Bionews, 329.
  • Farsides, B., Williams, C. and Alderson, P. (2004) Aiming towards moral ‘equilibrium’: health care professionals’ views on working within the morally contested field of antenatal screening, Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 50509.
  • Fox, R. and Swazey, J. (1992) Spare Parts: Organ Replacement in American Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Frederick, W., Wasieleski, D. and Weber, J. (2000) Values, ethics, and moral reasoning among healthcare professionals: a survey, HEC Forum, 1, 22, 12440.
  • Frith, L. (2009) Process and consensus – ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic: a qualitative study, Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 11, 6627.
  • Frith, L (in press) Reproductive technologies. In Chadwick, R. (ed.) The Concise Encyclopaedia of the Ethics of New Reproductive Technologies. California: Academic Press.
  • Gieryn, T. (1983) Boundary-work and the demarkation of science from non-science, American Sociological Review, 4, 86, 78195.
  • Gieryn, T. (1995) Boundaries of science. In Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J. and Pinch, T. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  • Gieryn, T. (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Gilbert, G. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: a Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldie, J., Schwartz, L. and Morrison, J. (2004) Students’ attitudes and potential behaviour to a competent patient’s request for withdrawal of treatment as they pass through a modern medical curriculum, Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 37176.
  • Gubrium, J. and Holstein, J. (1997) The New Language of Qualitative Method. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gubrium, J. and Holstein, J. (2000) Analyzing interpretative practice. In Denzin, Y. and Lincoln, N. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Haimes, E. (2002) What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations, Bioethics, 16, 2, 89113.
  • Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
  • Harris, J. and Holm, S. (eds) (1998) The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice and Regulation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hedgecoe, A. (2004) Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics, Bioethics, 18, 2, 12043.
  • Hoffmaster, B. (1990) Morality and the social sciences. In Weisz, G. (ed.) Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
  • Hoeyer, R. (2006) ‘Ethics wars’: reflections on the antagonism between bioethicists and social science observers of biomedicine, Human Studies, 29, 20327.
  • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2004) Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (Disclosure of Donor Information) Regulations 2004. Statutory Instrument 2004 No. 1511.
  • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2005) New Guidance on Welfare of the Child Assessments. London: CH(05)04, HFEA.
  • Hurst, S., Hull, S., DuVal, G. and Danis, M. (2005) How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis, Journal of Medical Ethics, 31 714.
  • Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Amos, A. (1997) The new genetics: professional discursive boundaries, The Sociological Review, 45, 2, 279303.
  • Kerr, A. and Cunningham-Burley, S. (2000) On ambivalence and risk: reflexive modernity and the new human genetics, Sociology, 34, 2, 283304.
  • Kleinman, A. (1999) Moral experience and ethical reflection: can ethnography reconcile them? A quandary; the the ‘new bioethics’, Daedelus, 128, 4, 6997.
  • Krones, T. and Richter, G. (2004) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD): European perspectives and the German situation, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29, 5, 62340.
  • Lord, J., Shaw, L., Dobbs, F. and Asharya, U. (2001) A time for a change and a time for equality – infertility services and the NHS, Human Fertility, 4, 4, 25660.
  • May, C. and Finch, T. (2009) Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory, Sociology, 43, 3, 53554.
  • McCracken, G. (1988) The Long Interview. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Morgan, D. and Lee, R. (1991) Blackstone’s Guide to the Human Fertilisaiton and Embryology Act 1990. London: Blackstone Press Limited.
  • Pennings, G. (2001) Postmenopausal women and the right of access to oocyte donation, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18, 2, 17181.
  • Potter, J., Wetherell, M., Gill, R. and Edwards, D. (1990) Discourse: noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology, 3, 20517.
  • Riley, L. (2007) Equality of access to NHS-funded IVF treatment in England and Wales. In Biggs, H. and Horsey, K. (eds) Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Reproducing Regulation. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
  • Sayer, A. (2004) Restoring the moral dimension: acknowledging lay normativity. Lancaster: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/sayer-restoring-moral-dimension.pdf
  • Seale, C. (1999) The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
  • Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
  • Silverman, D. (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text, and Interaction, 3rd Edition, London: Sage.
  • Smith, H. and Churchill, L. (1986) Professional Ethics and Primary Care Medicine. Durham, N Carolina: Duke University Press.
  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Turner, L. (2004) Bioethics needs to rethink its agenda, British Medical Journal, 328, 175.
  • Wainwright, S., Williams, C., Michael, M., Farsides, B. and Cribb, A. (2006) Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory, Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 6, 73248.
  • Warnock, M. (1985) A Question of Life: The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Williams, C., Alderson, P. and Farsides, B. (2002) Too many choices: hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening, Social Science and Medicine, 55, 5, 74353.
  • Woodward, P. and Press Officer HFEA (2008) Email: Query HFEA data.
  • Zussman, R. (1992) Intensive Care: Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.