SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akkad, A., Jackson, C., Kenyon, S., Dixon-Woods, M., et al. (2006) Patients’ perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study, BMJ, 333, 7567, 528.
  • Altheide, D.L. (2004) Ethnographic content analysis. In Lewis Beck, M.S., Bryman, A. and Liao, T.F. (eds) Sage Encyclopaedia of Social Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Angell, E., Jackson, C.J., Ashcroft, R.E., Bryman, A., et al. (2007) Is ‘inconsistency’ in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and a reflection, Clinical Ethics, 2, 2, 929.
  • Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th rev. edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Buccini, L., Iverson, D., Caputi, P. and Jones, C. (2010) An Australian based study of the readability of HIV/AIDS and Type 2 diabetes clinical trial informed consent documents, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 7, 3, 31319.
  • Clarke, A.E. (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. London: Sage.
  • Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (2004) Guidelines for researchers: patient information sheet and consent form. London: COREC.
  • Cox, K. (2002) Informed consent and decision-making: patients’ experiences of the process of recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials, Patient Education and Counseling, 46, 1, 3138.
  • Dixon-Woods, M. (2001) Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets, Social Science & Medicine, 52, 9, 141732.
  • Dixon-Woods, M and Tarrant, C. (2009) Why do people cooperate with medical research? Findings from three studies, Social Science & Medicine, 68, 12, 221522.
  • Dixon-Woods, M., Angell, E., Ashcroft, R. and Bryman, A. (2007) Written work: the social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters, Social Science & Medicine, 65, 4, 792802.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine: Chicago.
  • Grossman, S.A., Piantadosi, S. and Covahey, C. (1994) Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12, 10, 221115.
  • Hereu, P., Perez, E., Fuentes, I., Vidal, X., et al. (2010) Consent in clinical trials: what do patients know? Contemporary Clinical Trials, 31, 5, 4436.
  • Iedema, R. and Wodak, R. (1999) Introduction: organizational discourses and practices, Discourse and Society, 10, 1, 519.
  • Jefford, M. and Moore, R. (2008) Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents, The Lancet Oncology, 9, 5, 48593.
  • Merton, R.K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press
  • National Research Ethics Service (NRES) (2011) Information sheets and consent forms: guidance for researchers and reviewers. London: Health Research Authority.
  • O’Reilly, M., Dixon-Woods, M., Angell, E., Ashcroft, R., et al. (2009a) Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of Research Ethics Committee letters, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, 2, 246261.
  • O’Reilly, M., Armstrong, N. and Dixon-Woods, M. (2009b) Subject positions in research ethics committee letters: a discursive analysis, Clinical Ethics, 4, 4, 18794.
  • Potter, J. (1997) Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In Silverman, D. (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.
  • Robinson, E.J., Kerr, C., Stevens, A, Lilford, R., et al. (2004) Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials, Social Science & Medicine, 58, 4, 81124.
  • Sharp, S.M. (2004) Consent documents for oncology trials: does anybody read these things? American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 6, 5705.
  • Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘transitions’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39, Social Studies of Science, 19, 3, 387420.
  • Winner, L. (1986) The Whale and the Reactor: a Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.