The authors would like to thank an anonymous referee, Jie Li, Xiapeng Yin and Shunli Yao for their valuable comments and suggestions on the paper, but remain solely responsible for any errors or omissions herein.
Trade Liberalisation and Labour Income Share Variation: An Interpretation of China’s Deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem
Article first published online: 21 JUL 2011
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
The World Economy
Special Issue: ASIA REGIONAL ISSUE
Volume 34, Issue 7, pages 1071–1087, July 2011
How to Cite
Huang, X., Xu, S. and Lu, J. (2011), Trade Liberalisation and Labour Income Share Variation: An Interpretation of China’s Deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem. World Economy, 34: 1071–1087. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01365.x
- Issue published online: 21 JUL 2011
- Article first published online: 21 JUL 2011
By constructing a two-country, three-commodity, three-sector theoretical model, we show that trade liberalisation has double effects, i.e., ‘factor price effect’ and ‘technology progress effect’, on labour income share. China’s deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem is mainly due to the negative effect of technology progress, which weakens the positive pulling effect of trade liberalisation on labour income share. Based on the panel data of 29 provinces and cities in China dated from 1987 to 2006, we build up an empirical model. We find that because of the offsetting cancellation of opposite effects, the overall effect of trade liberalisation on labour income share is insignificant. However, when eliminating the negative effect of technology progress on labour income share, the effect of trade liberalisation becomes significantly positive. Moreover, the positive effect of trade liberalisation has become smaller in recent years. This is because of the transformation of export structure, which has led to a decrease in the positive effect of export on labour income share.