Who Should Pay for Higher Education?
Version of Record online: 26 MAR 2010
© 2010 The Author. Journal compilation © 2010 Journal of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Volume 44, Issue 4, pages 479–495, November 2010
How to Cite
BOU-HABIB, P. (2010), Who Should Pay for Higher Education?. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44: 479–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2010.00739.x
- Issue online: 26 MAR 2010
- Version of Record online: 26 MAR 2010
Policies that shift the costs of higher education from the taxpayer to the university student or graduate are increasingly popular, yet they have not been subjected to a thorough normative analysis. This paper provides a critical survey of the standard arguments that have been used in the public debate on higher education funding. These arguments are found to be wanting. In their place, the paper offers a more systematic approach for dealing with the normative issues raised by the funding of higher education. This approach is drawn from the political theory of John Rawls, whose view seeks to reconcile the values of equality, efficiency, and liberty. I show that, contrary to what we may think at first, an egalitarian approach like Rawls' does not in principle rule out policies that shift the funding burden from taxpayers to students or graduates. Which funding policy that approach selects as most fair will instead depend on the likely impact on the lifetime income prospects of the worst-off group in society, and this is a question which will need to be settled by empirical evidence.