Journal of Political Philosophy
Explore this journal >

On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory†

Authors

Continue reading full article

Ancillary

Article Information

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00317.x

Format Available

Full text: HTML | PDF

© 2008 The Author. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Request Permissions

Publication History

  • Issue online:
  • Version of record online:

Related content

Articles related to the one you are viewing

Citing Literature

  • Number of times cited: 22
  1. 1Eva Erman, Niklas Möller, Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World: The Priority of Morality and the Autonomy of the Political, British Journal of Political Science, 2015, 45, 01, 215CrossRef
  2. 2Eva Erman, Niklas Möller, Practices and Principles: On the Methodological Turn in Political Theory, Philosophy Compass, 2015, 10, 8, 533Wiley Online Library
  3. 3Adrian Little, Alan Finlayson, Simon Tormey, Reconstituting Realism: Feasibility, Utopia and Epistemological Imperfection, Contemporary Political Theory, 2015, 14, 3, 276CrossRef
  4. 4Luca Jacopo Uberti, Good and Bad Idealizations in Political Theory, Theoria, 2014, 80, 3, 205Wiley Online Library
  5. 5Matt Sleat, Realism, Liberalism and Non-ideal Theory Or, Are there Two Ways to do Realistic Political Theory?, Political Studies, 2014, n/aWiley Online Library
  6. 6Jörg Schaub, The Incompleteness of Ideal Theory, Res Publica, 2014, 20, 4, 413CrossRef
  7. 7Juan Espindola, Moises Vaca, The Problem of Historical Rectification for Rawlsian Theory, Res Publica, 2014, 20, 3, 227CrossRef
  8. 8Eduardo Rivera-López, International Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2013Wiley Online Library
  9. 9Laura Valentini, Justice, Disagreement and Democracy, British Journal of Political Science, 2013, 43, 01, 177CrossRef
  10. 10Robert Jubb, Social connection and practice dependence: some recent developments in the global justice literature: Iris Marion Young,Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011; and Ayelet Banai, Miriam Ronzoni and Christian Schemmel,Social Justice, Global Dynamics. Oxford: Routledge, 2011, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2013, 16, 5, 698CrossRef
  11. 11Lisa L. Fuller, Burdened Societies and Transitional Justice, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2012, 15, 3, 369CrossRef
  12. 12Pablo Gilabert, Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2012, 15, 1, 39CrossRef
  13. 13Francesco Biondo, Comparative vs. Transcendental Approaches to Justice: A Misleading Dichotomy in Sen'sThe Idea of Justice, Ratio Juris, 2012, 25, 4, 555Wiley Online Library
  14. 14Laura Valentini, Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map, Philosophy Compass, 2012, 7, 9, 654Wiley Online Library
  15. 15Pablo Gilabert, Holly Lawford-Smith, Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration, Political Studies, 2012, 60, 4, 809Wiley Online Library
  16. 16DAVID WIENS, Prescribing Institutions Without Ideal Theory*, Journal of Political Philosophy, 2012, 20, 1, 45Wiley Online Library
  17. 17Alan Hamlin, Zofia Stemplowska, Theory, Ideal Theory and the Theory of Ideals, Political Studies Review, 2012, 10, 1, 48Wiley Online Library
  18. 18ANDREW MASON, What Is the Point of Justice?, Utilitas, 2012, 24, 04, 525CrossRef
  19. 19Laura Valentini, A PARADIGM SHIFT IN THEORIZING ABOUT JUSTICE? A CRITIQUE OF SEN, Economics and Philosophy, 2011, 27, 03, 297CrossRef
  20. 20LISA TESSMAN, Idealizing Morality, Hypatia, 2010, 25, 4, 797Wiley Online Library

View all 22 citations