John P. Conley, Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, (email@example.com). Fan-chin Kung, Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong and Department of Economics, East Carolina University, (firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com).
Private Benefits, Warm Glow, and Reputation in the Free and Open Source Software Production Model
Article first published online: 19 JUL 2010
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Public Economic Theory
Volume 12, Issue 4, pages 665–689, August 2010
How to Cite
CONLEY, J. P. and KUNG, F.-C. (2010), Private Benefits, Warm Glow, and Reputation in the Free and Open Source Software Production Model. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12: 665–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2009.01469.x
We thank Ted Bergstrom, Parkash Chander, The City University of Hong Kong, The National University of Singapore, and the participants of the Association of Public Economic Theory Workshop on Leadership, Altruism and Social Organization.
- Issue published online: 19 JUL 2010
- Article first published online: 19 JUL 2010
- Received November 7, 2008; Accepted June 8, 2009.
A great deal of production and consumption behavior takes place in the context of social organizations that seem to fall outside of the traditional paradigm of profit/utility maximization. These organizations are voluntary in nature and rely on contributions from members to achieve their objectives. Examples include the Linux operating system and other FOSS projects, political movements, churches and religious groups, Habitat for Humanity, and similar charitable organizations. In this paper, we consider a world containing agents with heterogeneous abilities who may voluntarily choose to make effort contributions to one or more different public projects. Agents are motivated by a desire to be seen as significant contributors to important and valuable projects, the warm glow from the act of contributing, and a desire to directly enjoy the benefits of projects when complete. We find that contributions from others can be either strategic complements or substitutes. We show that Nash equilibria exist and study how agents’ abilities and project quality affect the equilibrium levels of contributions.