AGREEING TO DISAGREE: Indigenous Pluralism from Human Rights to Bioethics
Version of Record online: 10 AUG 2009
© 2009 Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc.
Journal of Religious Ethics
Volume 37, Issue 3, pages 513–529, September 2009
How to Cite
Durante, C. (2009), AGREEING TO DISAGREE: Indigenous Pluralism from Human Rights to Bioethics. Journal of Religious Ethics, 37: 513–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00398.x
- Issue online: 10 AUG 2009
- Version of Record online: 10 AUG 2009
- brain death;
- conscience clause;
- human rights;
- indigenous pluralism;
- religious diversity
David Hollenbach, working within the context of human rights theory, has developed the notion of “indigenous pluralism” as a means of coping with the problems that arise when different religious traditions hold distinct or incompatible interpretations of human rights. It will be argued that indigenous pluralism is a theoretically and practically useful concept for bioethics as well and hence should be incorporated into bioethical methodology and processes of bioethical policy formation. Subsequently, the notion of indigenous pluralism will be discussed in relation to determinations of death as a means of illustrating this concept's applicability to bioethical inquiry.