Book Discussion Section: COMPARATIVE ETHICS, ISLAM, AND HUMAN RIGHTS: Internal Pluralism and the Possible Development of Tradition
Article first published online: 18 AUG 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00446.x
© 2010 Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Hollenbach, D. (2010), Book Discussion Section: COMPARATIVE ETHICS, ISLAM, AND HUMAN RIGHTS: Internal Pluralism and the Possible Development of Tradition. Journal of Religious Ethics, 38: 580–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00446.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 AUG 2010
- Article first published online: 18 AUG 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- human rights;
- Islam;
- dialogue;
- colonialism;
- virtue;
- internal pluralism;
- faith and reason;
- Irene Oh;
- Abul A‘la Maududi;
- Sayyid Qutb;
- 'Abdolkarim Soroush
ABSTRACT
Dialogue with three major Muslim authors shows that Islam can take a positive stance toward human rights while also presenting differing interpretations of the meaning and scope of rights. Because of their subordination of norms reached through reason to those drawn from faith, as well as negative experiences of the impact of Western colonization of parts of the Muslim world, Abul A‘la Maududi and Sayyid Qutb place significant restrictions on rights of conscience. 'Abdolkarim Soroush's positive support for the role of reason in Islamic faith and his less-negative assessment of the West lead him to more vigorous support for the human rights agenda. This study raises the question of whether the humility needed in comparative ethics and the respect for others at the root of human rights are necessarily linked.

1467-9795/asset/JORE_left.gif?v=1&s=8ff8e8f037be202a541320d69cf42eacebefbd94)
1467-9795/asset/JORE_right.gif?v=1&s=ea7a75d8ae854d93d0e87669b83c60ef93e669ab)
