SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ades, A. E. and Sutton, A. J. (2006) Multiparameter evidence synthesis in epidemiology and medical decision-making: current approaches. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 169, 535.
  • Armitage, P. and Berry, G. (2001) Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Balk, E. M., Bonis, P. A. L., Moskowitz, H., Schmid, C. H., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Wang, C. and Lau, J. (2002) Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. J. Am. Med. Ass., 287, 29732982.
  • Bowman, J. M., Chown, B., Lewis, M. and Pollock, J. M. (1978) Rh isoimmunization during pregnancy: antenatal prophylaxis. Can. Med. Ass. J., 118, 623627.
  • Bowman, J. M. and Pollock, J. M. (1978) Antenatal prophylaxis of Rh isoimmunization: 28-weeks’-gestation service program. Can. Med. Ass. J., 118, 627630.
  • Bowman, J. M. and Pollock, J. M. (1987) Failures of intravenous Rh immune globulin prophylaxis: an analysis of the reasons for such failures. Transfusn Med. Rev., 1, 101112.
  • Chilcott, J., Lloyd Jones, M., Wight, J., Forman, K., Wray, J., Beverley, C. and Tappenden, P. (2003) A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus-negative. Hlth Technol. Assmnt, 7, no. 4.
  • Contreras, M. (1998) The prevention of Rh haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn—general background. Br. J. Obstetr. Gyn., suppl., 18, 710.
  • De Craen, A. J. M., Van Vliet, H. A. A. M. and Helmerhorst, F. M. (2005) An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorporation of results from clinical trial quality assessment. J. Clin. Epidem., 58, 311313.
  • Deeks, J. J., Dinnes, J., D'Amico, R., Sowden, A. J., Sakarovitch, C. and Song, F. (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Hlth Technol. Assmnt, 7, no. 27.
  • DerSimonian, R. and Kacker, R. (2007) Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp. Clin. Trials, 28, 105114.
  • DerSimonian, R. and Laird, N. (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Contr. Clin. Trials, 7, 177188.
  • Downs, S. H. and Black, N. (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care intervention. J. Epidem. Commty Hlth, 52, 377384.
  • Eddy, D. M., Hasselblad, V. and Schachter, R. (1992) Meta-analysis by the Confidence Profile Method: the Statistical Synthesis of Evidence. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Evans, M., Hastings, N. and Peacock, B. (1993) Statistical Distributions. New York: Wiley Interscience.
  • Gluud, L. L. (2006) Bias in clinical intervention research. Am. J. Epidem., 163, 493501.
  • Greenland, S. (2003) The impact of prior distributions for uncontrolled confounding and response bias: a case study of the relation of wire codes and magnetic fields to childhood leukemia. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 98, 4754.
  • Greenland, S. (2005) Multiple-bias modelling for analysis of observational data (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 168, 267306.
  • Greenland, S. and O'Rourke, K. (2001) On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. Biostatistics, 2, 463471.
  • Hermann, M., Kjellman, H. and Ljunggren, C. (1984) Antenatal prophylaxis of Rh immunization with 250 μg anti-D immunoglobulin. Acta Obstetr. Gyn. Scand., suppl., 124, 115.
  • Higgins, J. P. T. and Green, S. (eds) (2005) The Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. In The Cochrane Library, issue 3. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Higgins, J. P. T. and Thompson, S. G. (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statist. Med., 21, 15391558.
  • Huchet, J., Dallemagne, S., Huchet, C., Brossard, Y., Larsen, M. and Parnet-Mathieu, F. (1987) Application anté-partum du traitement préventif d'immunisation Rhésus D chez les femmes Rhésus négatif. J. Gyn. Obstetr. Biol. Reprodn, 16, 101111.
  • Juni, P., Altman, D. G. and Egger, M. (2001) Systematic review in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. Br. Med. J., 323, 4246.
  • Kjaergard, L. L., Villumsen, J. and Gluud, C. (2001) Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann. Intern. Med., 135, 982989.
  • Lee, D. and Rawlinson, V. I. (1995) Multicentre trial of antepartum low-dose anti-D immunoglobulin. Transfusn Med., 5, 1519.
  • MacKenzie, I. Z., Bowell, P., Gregory, H., Pratt, G., Guest, C. and Entwistle, C. C. (1999) Routine antenatal Rhesus D immunoglobulin prophylaxis: the results of a prospective 10 year study. Br. J. Obstetr. Gyn., 106, 492497.
  • Mayne, S., Parker, J. H., Harden, T. A., Dodds, S. D. and Beale, J. A. (1997) Rate of RhD sensitisation before and after implementation of a community based antenatal prophylaxis programme. Br. Med. J., 315, 1588.
  • Moher, D., Pham, B., Jones, A., Cook, D. J., Jadad, A. R., Moher, M., Tugwell, P. and Klassen, T. P. (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet, 352, 609613.
  • Moja, L. P., Telaro, E., D'Amico, R., Moschetti, I., Coe, L. and Liberati, A. (2005) Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study. Br. Med. J., 330, 10531055.
  • Oakley, J. E. and O'Hagan A. (2007) Uncertainty in prior elicitations: a nonparametric approach. Biometrika, 94, 427441.
  • O'Hagan, A., Buck, C. E., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., Jenkinson, D. J., Oakley, J. E. and Rakow, T. (2006) Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts’ Probabilities. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Parsons, M. L., Van den Hof, M. C., Armson, B. A., Coffey, J., Liston, R. M., Peddle, L. J. and Stinson, D. A. (1998) A comparison of the rate of Rh(D) alloimmunisation between Nova Scotia and Scotland. Br. J. Obstetr. Gyn., suppl., 18, 39.
  • Rothstein, H., Sutton, A. J. and Borenstein, M. (2005) Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Schneeweiss, S., Glynn, R. J., Tsai, E. H., Avorn, J. and Solomon, D. H. (2005) Adjusting for unmeasured confounders in pharmacoepidemiologic claims data using external information. Epidemiology, 16, 1724.
  • Schulz, K. F., Chalmers, I., Hayes, R. J. and Altman, D. G. (1995) Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. J. Am. Med. Ass., 273, 408412.
  • Smith, T. C., Spiegelhalter, D. J. and Thomas, A. (1995) Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study. Statist. Med., 14, 26852699.
  • Spiegelhalter, D. J. and Best, N. G. (2003) Bayesian approaches to multiple sources of evidence and uncertainty in complex cost-effectiveness modelling. Statist. Med., 22, 36873709.
  • Sterne, J. A. C., Welton, N. J., Ades, A. E., Altman, D. G. and Carlin, J. B. (2008) Incorporation of potentially biased evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Submitted to Int. J. Epidem.
  • Taylor, B. N. and Kuyatt, C. E. (1994) Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. Technical Note 1297. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg.
  • Tovey, L. A. D., Townley, A., Stevenson, B. J. and Taverner, J. (1983) The Yorkshire antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin trial in primigravidae. Lancet, ii, 244246.
  • Trolle, B. (1989) Prenatal Rh-immune prophylaxis with 300 μg immune globulin anti-D in the 28th week of pregnancy. Acta Obstetr. Gyn. Scand., 68, 4547.
  • Welton, N. J., Ades, A. E., Carlin, J. B., Altman, D. G. and Sterne, J. A. C. (2008) Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, to be published.
  • White, I. R., Higgins, J. P. T. and Wood, A. (2008) Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analysis: part 1, two-stage methods. Statist. Med., 27, 711–727.
  • Williamson, P. R. and Gamble, C. (2005) Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis. Statist. Med., 24, 15471561.
  • Wolpert, R. L. and Mengersen, K. L. (2004) Adjusted likelihoods for synthesizing empirical evidence from studies that differ in quality and design: effects of environmental tobacco smoke. Statist. Sci., 19, 450471.