SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Achard, M. (2007). Usage-based semantics: Meaning and distribution of three French “breaking” verbs. In M. Nenonen & S. Niemi (Eds.). Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the first Nordic conference on syntactic freezes, Joensuu, May 19–20, 2007 (pp. 113). Joensuu , Finland : Joensuu University Press.
  • Bartning, I., & Hammarberg, B. (2007). The functions of a high-frequency collocation in native and learner discourse: The case of French c’est and Swedish det är. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 143.
  • Beckner, C., Ellis, N. C., Blythe, R., Holland, J., Bybee, J., Ke, J., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1), 126.
  • Berdan, R. (1996). Disentangling language acquisition from language variation. In R. Bayley & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 203243). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
  • Bolinger, D. (1979). Meaning and memory. In G. G. Haydu (Ed.), Experience forms. Their cultural and individual place and function (pp. 95111). The Hague: Mouton.
  • Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. J., & Schumann, J. H. (1978). The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In E. M. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 207230). Rowley , MA : Newbury House.
  • Collins, L., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2009). Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function [special issue]. The Modern Language Journal 93(3).
  • Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Dąbrowska, E., & Lieven, E. (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children's question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 437474.
  • de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 721.
  • Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256310). Malden , MA : Blackwell.
  • Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Malden , MA : Blackwell.
  • Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143188.
  • Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111139.
  • Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 370385.
  • Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1), 90125.
  • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press.
  • Eskildsen, S. W. (2009). Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 335357.
  • Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 337373). Honolulu : University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
  • Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2007). Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. In M. Nenonen & S. Niemi (Eds.), Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes, Joensuu, May 19–20, 2007 (pp. 86–99). Joensuu , Finland : Joensuu University Press.
  • Goldberg, A., & Casenhiser, D. (2008). Construction learning and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 197215). New York : Routledge.
  • Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182200.
  • Hellermann, J., & Cole, E. (2009). Practices for social interaction in the language learning classroom: Disengagements from dyadic task interaction. Applied Linguistics, 30, 186215.
  • Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon , UK : Multilingual Matters.
  • Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299345). Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (vol. 1, pp. 155175). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Huebner, T. (1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35, 141163.
  • Hyltenstam, K. (1977). Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning, 27, 383411.
  • Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117142). New York : Taylor & Francis.
  • Kemmer, S., & Barlow, M. (2000). Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. vii–xxviii). Stanford , CA : Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  • Kendon, A. (2004). Visible action as utterance. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1966). Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In J. Lyons & R. J. Wales (Eds.), Psycholinguistic papers: The proceedings of the 1966 Edinburgh conference (pp. 183219). Edinburgh , UK : Edinburgh University Press.
  • Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press.
  • Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.). Usage-based models of language (pp. 164). Stanford , CA : Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1991). Staking out the territory. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 315150.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2005). Second language acquisition and fossilization: There is no end, and there is no state. In Z.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 189200). Clevedon , UK : Multilingual Matters.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590619.
  • Lieven, E., Salomo, D., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 481508.
  • MacWhinney, B. (1975). Pragmatic patterns in child syntax. Stanford Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 10, 153165.
  • Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109135.
  • Mellow, J. D. (2006). The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Linguistics, 27, 645670.
  • Nattinger, J. P., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press.
  • Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 221245). London : Continuum.
  • Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983).Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191226). London : Longman.
  • Peters, A. (1983).The units of language acquisition. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Pica, T. (2005). Second language acquisition research and applied linguistics. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 261283). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57101). Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Reder, S. (2005). The “Lab School.” Focus on Basics, 8a, 16.
  • Reder, S., Harris, K. A., & Setzler, K. (2003). A multimedia adult learner corpus. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 546557.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequential analysis: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E. & Thompson S. A.. (1996). Introduction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 151). Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Schumann, J. H. (1976). Second language acquisition: The Pidginization hypothesis. Language Learning, 26, 391408.
  • Schumann, J. H. (1979). The acquisition of English negation by speakers of Spanish: A review of the literature. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), The acquisition and use of Spanish and English as first and second languages (pp. 332). Washington , DC : Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209231.
  • Stauble, A. (1978). The process of decreolization: A model for second language development. Language Learning, 28, 2954.
  • Stauble, A., & Schumann, J. H. (1983). Towards a description of the Spanish-English Basilang. In K. M Bayley, M. H. Long, & S. Peck (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 6882). Rowley , MA : Newbury House.
  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125144). Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press.
  • Tarone, E., & Swierzbin, B. (2009). Exploring learner language. Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press.
  • Theodórsdóttir, G., & Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). The use of English in everyday Icelandic as a second language: Establishing intersubjectivity and doing learning. NordAnd, 6(2), 5985.
  • Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 6182.
  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Tummers, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D. (2005). Usage-based approaches in cognitive linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1–2, 225261.
  • Turk, M. J. (1999). Negatively formulated questions in interaction. In W. Klein & A. Barber (Eds.), Crossroads of language, interaction and culture (vol. 2, pp. 3948). Los Angeles : The Center for Language, Interaction, and Culture.
  • van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 246260). Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press.
  • Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & de Bot, K. (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
  • Waara, R. (2004). Construal, convention, and constructions in L2 Speech. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language pedagogy (pp. 51–75). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Weinert, R. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review. Applied Linguistics, 16, 180205.
  • Young, R. (1988). Variation and the interlanguage hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 281302.