We thank Niclas Berggren, Anders Björklund, David Colander, Robin Douhan, Bruno Frey, Randall Holcombe, Henrik Jordahl, Dan Klein, Assar Lindbeck, Kevin O'Rourke, Andrew Oswald, Donald Siegel, Roy Thurik, Heinrich Ursprung, Hans-Joachim Voth, three anonymous referees and seminar participants at Stockholm University, Örebro University and the Stockholm School of Economics for useful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. Skilful research assistance was provided by Martin Olsson and Johan Egebark. Financial support from the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Research Foundation and the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
HOW SHOULD RESEARCH PERFORMANCE BE MEASURED? A STUDY OF SWEDISH ECONOMISTS*
Article first published online: 6 APR 2011
© 2011 The Authors. The Manchester School © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and The University of Manchester
The Manchester School
Volume 79, Issue 6, pages 1139–1156, December 2011
How to Cite
HENREKSON, M. and WALDENSTRÖM, D. (2011), HOW SHOULD RESEARCH PERFORMANCE BE MEASURED? A STUDY OF SWEDISH ECONOMISTS. The Manchester School, 79: 1139–1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2010.02216.x
Manuscript received 29.12.08; final version received 19.03.10.
- Issue published online: 18 OCT 2011
- Article first published online: 6 APR 2011
This article has been cited by:
- 2Do the best scholars attract the highest speaking fees? An exploration of internal and external influence, Scientometrics, 2014, 101, 1, 793, , , , , ,
- 6Citation success: Evidence from economic history journal publications, Explorations in Economic History, 2012, 49, 1, 92, , ,
- 7Ranking economists on the basis of many indicators: An alternative approach using RePEc data, Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6, 3, 389, ,