PHILOSOPHICAL THEORIES OF PRIVACY: IMPLICATIONS FOR AN ADEQUATE ONLINE PRIVACY POLICY
Article first published online: 4 JAN 2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00474.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
TAVANI, H. T. (2007), PHILOSOPHICAL THEORIES OF PRIVACY: IMPLICATIONS FOR AN ADEQUATE ONLINE PRIVACY POLICY. Metaphilosophy, 38: 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00474.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 JAN 2007
- Article first published online: 4 JAN 2007
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- control theory of privacy;
- informational privacy;
- nonintrusion theory of privacy;
- online privacy policies;
- privacy in public;
- RALC theory of privacy;
- seclusion theory of privacy
Abstract: This essay critically examines some classic philosophical and legal theories of privacy, organized into four categories: the nonintrusion, seclusion, limitation, and control theories of privacy. Although each theory includes one or more important insights regarding the concept of privacy, I argue that each falls short of providing an adequate account of privacy. I then examine and defend a theory of privacy that incorporates elements of the classic theories into one unified theory: the Restricted Access/Limited Control (RALC) theory of privacy. Using an example involving data-mining technology on the Internet, I show how RALC can help us to frame an online privacy policy that is sufficiently comprehensive in scope to address a wide range of privacy concerns that arise in connection with computers and information technology.

1467-9973/asset/META_left.gif?v=1&s=bbeacc067e710d8045b896b6f2734be9e1bf5d0b)
