Symposium: The Pursuit of Philosophy: Some Cambridge Perspectives
What Is Realistic Political Philosophy?
Version of Record online: 5 JAN 2012
© 2012 The Author. Metaphilosophy © 2012 Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Volume 43, Issue 1-2, pages 58–70, January 2012
How to Cite
Runciman, D. (2012), What Is Realistic Political Philosophy?. Metaphilosophy, 43: 58–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01730.x
- Issue online: 5 JAN 2012
- Version of Record online: 5 JAN 2012
In the study of politics, Cambridge is sometimes associated with a school of political philosophical “realism.” This article discusses what realism in political philosophy might mean, by examining first what might count as “unrealistic” political philosophy (looking at Sidgwick and Rawls), and then some recent attempts to identify a more realistic philosophical approach to politics. It argues that realistic political philosophy tends to emerge as a thin account of politics that falls between the stools of either more philosophical (i.e., more idealistic) or less philosophical (i.e., more historical) accounts. It illustrates this in relation to Sidgwick and also Hobbes, who is often held up as the quintessential realist in the history of political philosophy.