Symposium: The Pursuit of Philosophy: Some Cambridge Perspectives
The Cambridge Revolt Against Idealism: Was There Ever an Eden?
Article first published online: 5 JAN 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01736.x
© 2012 The Author. Metaphilosophy © 2012 Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
Macbride, F. (2012), The Cambridge Revolt Against Idealism: Was There Ever an Eden?. Metaphilosophy, 43: 135–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01736.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 5 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 5 JAN 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Russell;
- Wittgenstein;
- logical constants;
- relations
Abstract
According to one creation myth, analytic philosophy emerged in Cambridge when Moore and Russell abandoned idealism in favour of naive realism: every word stood for something; it was only after “the Fall,” Russell's discovery of his theory of descriptions, that they realized some complex phrases (“the present King of France”) didn't stand for anything. It has become a commonplace of recent scholarship to object that even before the Fall, Russell acknowledged that such phrases may fail to denote. But we need to go further: even before the Fall, Russell had taken an altogether more discerning approach to the ontology of logic and relations than is usually recognized.

1467-9973/asset/META_left.gif?v=1&s=bbeacc067e710d8045b896b6f2734be9e1bf5d0b)
