ARTICLE
Burge on Perceptual Entitlement
Article first published online: 11 APR 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01744.x
© 2012 The Author. Metaphilosophy © 2012 Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
Vahid, H. (2012), Burge on Perceptual Entitlement. Metaphilosophy, 43: 187–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01744.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 11 APR 2012
- Article first published online: 11 APR 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Burge;
- nondoxastic justification;
- entitlement;
- perceptual experience;
- belief
Abstract:
This article is concerned with the question of the nature of the epistemic liaison between experience and belief. The problem, often known as the problem of nondoxastic justification, is to see how a causal transition between experience and belief could assume a normative dimension, that is, how perceptual experience serves to justify beliefs about the world. Currently a number of theories have been proposed to resolve this problem. The article considers a particular solution offered by Tyler Burge which, among other things, introduces a new type of positive epistemic status or warrant, namely, entitlement. It contends that Burge's notion of entitlement cannot be of any help in resolving the problem of nondoxastic justification. Burge's account is compared and contrasted with other, similar, approaches to the problem of nondoxastic justification.

1467-9973/asset/META_left.gif?v=1&s=bbeacc067e710d8045b896b6f2734be9e1bf5d0b)
