ARTICLE
Evaluating Google as an Epistemic Tool
Article first published online: 16 JUL 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01759.x
© 2012 The Author. Metaphilosophy © 2012 Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue

Metaphilosophy
Special Issue: Philoweb: Toward a Philosophy of the Web: Guest Editors: Harry Halpin and Alexandre Monnin
Volume 43, Issue 4, pages 426–445, July 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Simpson, T. W. (2012), Evaluating Google as an Epistemic Tool. Metaphilosophy, 43: 426–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01759.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 16 JUL 2012
- Article first published online: 16 JUL 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Google;
- knowledge;
- personalisation;
- search engine;
- social epistemology;
- testimony;
- Web
Abstract
This article develops a social epistemological analysis of Web-based search engines, addressing the following questions. First, what epistemic functions do search engines perform? Second, what dimensions of assessment are appropriate for the epistemic evaluation of search engines? Third, how well do current search engines perform on these? The article explains why they fulfil the role of a surrogate expert, and proposes three ways of assessing their utility as an epistemic tool—timeliness, authority prioritisation, and objectivity. “Personalisation” is a current trend in Internet-delivered services, and consists in tailoring online content to the interests of the individual user. It is argued here that personalisation threatens the objectivity of search results. Objectivity is a public good; so there is a prima facie case for government regulation of search engines.

1467-9973/asset/META_left.gif?v=1&s=bbeacc067e710d8045b896b6f2734be9e1bf5d0b)