For discussion and/or feedback on earlier versions of this paper I’m indebted to Emmanuel Chemla, Larry Horn, Ira Noveck, Nausicaa Pouscoulous, and an anonymous reviewer for Mind & Language. The final version of this paper was submitted in November, 2007.
Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics
Version of Record online: 21 JAN 2009
© 2009 The Author Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Mind & Language
Volume 24, Issue 1, pages 51–79, February 2009
How to Cite
GEURTS, B. (2009), Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics. Mind & Language, 24: 51–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01353.x
- Issue online: 21 JAN 2009
- Version of Record online: 21 JAN 2009
Abstract: The Gricean theory of conversational implicature has always been plagued by data suggesting that what would seem to be conversational inferences may occur within the scope of operators like believe, for example; which for bona fide implicatures should be an impossibility. Concentrating my attention on scalar implicatures, I argue that, for the most part, such observations can be accounted for within a Gricean framework, and without resorting to local pragmatic inferences of any kind. However, there remains a small class of marked cases that cannot be treated as conversational implicatures, and they do require a local mode of pragmatic interpretation.