SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Borg, J. S., Hynes, C., Van Horn, J., Grafton, S. and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2006: Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: an fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 80317.
  • Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Ladavas, E. and di Pellegrino, G. 2007: Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 8492.
  • Cushman, F., Young, L. and Hauser, M. 2006: The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 108289.
    Direct Link:
  • Dennett, D. C. 1978: Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.
  • Gibbard, A. and Stroud, B. 2008: Reconciling our Aims: In Search of Bases for Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Greene, J. D. 2008: The secret joke of Kant's soul. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3579.
  • Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E. and Cohen, J. D. 2008: Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 114454.
  • Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M. and Cohen, J. D. 2004: The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389400.
  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M. and Cohen, J. D. 2001: An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 210507.
  • Haidt, J. 2001: The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 81434.
  • Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L. and Mikhail, J. 2007: A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind & Language, 22, 121.
  • Heekeren, H. R., Wartenburger, I., Schmidt, H., Schwintowski, H. P. and Villringer, A. 2003: An fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making. NeuroReport, 14, 121519.
  • Kahane, G. and Shackel, N. 2008: Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias? Nature, 452, E5E6.
  • Kahane, G., Wiech, K., Shackel, N., Farias, M., Savalescu, J. and Tracey, I. submitted: The neural basis of intuitive and counter-intuitive moral judgement.
  • Koenigs, M. and Tranel, D. 2007: Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the ultimatum game. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 95156.
  • Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. and Damasio, A. 2007: Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 446, 90811.
  • Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. and Damasio, A. 2008: Koenigs et al. reply. Nature, 452, E5E6.
  • Kohlberg, L. 1981: Essays on Moral Development, Volume. 1: The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
  • Mikhail, J. 2008: Moral cognition and computational theory. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3579.
  • Moll, J. and de Oliveira-Souza, R. 2008: When morality is hard to like. Scientific American Mind., 2935.
  • Moore, A. B., Clark, B. A. and Kane, M. J. 2008: Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19, 54957.
    Direct Link:
  • Petrinovich, L., O’Neill, P. and Jorgensen, M. 1993: An empirical study of moral intuitions: toward an evolutionary ethics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 467478.
  • Singer, P. 2005: Ethics and intuitions. Journal of Ethics, 9, 33152.
  • Sosa, E. 2007: Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition. Philosophical Studies, 132, 99107.
  • Valdesolo, P. and DeSteno, D. 2006: Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 47677.
    Direct Link:
  • Wheatley, T. and Haidt, J. 2005: Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 78084.
    Direct Link: