This article has benefitted from the advice of Nora Newcombe, Lisa Saksida, and Charlotte Russell. JR acknowledges the hospitality of Professor Newcombe, and also of Professor Bill Overton, at Temple University, Philadelphia, during the early spring of 2009, during which time the body of this article was drafted.
A Minimalist Approach to the Development of Episodic Memory
Version of Record online: 12 JAN 2012
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Mind & Language
Volume 27, Issue 1, pages 29–54, February 2012
How to Cite
RUSSELL, J. and HANNA, R. (2012), A Minimalist Approach to the Development of Episodic Memory. Mind & Language, 27: 29–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01434.x
- Issue online: 12 JAN 2012
- Version of Record online: 12 JAN 2012
Episodic memory is usually regarded in a Conceptualist light, in the sense of its being dependent upon the grasp of concepts directly relevant to the act of episodic recollection itself, such as a concept of past times and of the self as an experiencer. Given this view, its development is typically timed as being in the early school-age years (Perner, 2001; Tulving, 2005). We present a minimalist, Non-Conceptualist approach in opposition to this view, but one that also exists in clear contrast to the kind of minimalism (‘episodic-like’) espoused by Clayton and Dickinson (1998) with regard to memory in food-caching birds. While emphasising the nonconceptual elements of episodic memory (in common with the ‘episodic-like’ approach) we also insist on the essentially phenomenological nature of the memory (as does the Conceptualist approach). We propose the third year of life as a plausible onset period. Our view is rooted in Kantian assumptions about the spatiotemporal content of experience (and thus of re-experience) and about the synthetic unity of experience—and thus of re-experience. We answer two objections to this position.