Cognitivism: A New Theory of Singular Thought?

Authors

  • SARAH SAWYER

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Philosophy
      University of Sussex
      Department of Philosophy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QN, UK.
      Email:s.a.sawyer@sussex.ac.uk
    Search for more papers by this author

  • I would like to thank two extremely helpful referees from Mind & Language for comments. Thanks also to audiences at the University of Manchester and the University of Sussex, to whom earlier versions of this article were presented.

Department of Philosophy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QN, UK.
Email:s.a.sawyer@sussex.ac.uk

Abstract

In a series of recent articles, Robin Jeshion has developed a theory of singular thought which she calls ‘cognitivism’. According to Jeshion, cognitivism offers a middle path between acquaintance theories—which she takes to impose too strong a requirement on singular thought, and semantic instrumentalism—which she takes to impose too weak a requirement. In this article, I raise a series of concerns about Jeshion's theory, and suggest that the relevant data can be accommodated by a version of acquaintance theory that distinguishes unsuccessful thoughts of singular form from successful singular thoughts, and in addition allows for ‘trace-based’ acquaintance.

Ancillary