SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Kelly McCormick, Companions in innocence: defending a new methodological assumption for theorizing about moral responsibility, Philosophical Studies, 2014,

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Dylan Murray, Eddy Nahmias, Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2014, 88, 2
  3. 3
    Joshua May, On the very concept of free will, Synthese, 2014,

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Justin C. Fisher, Pragmatic experimental philosophy, Philosophical Psychology, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Derek Leben, Kristine Wilckens, Pushing the Intuitions behind Moral Internalism, Philosophical Psychology, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    J. F. Christensen, A. Flexas, P. de Miguel, C. J. Cela-Conde, E. Munar, Roman Catholic beliefs produce characteristic neural responses to moral dilemmas, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2014, 9, 2, 240

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard, Eddy Nahmias, Chandra Sripada, Lisa Thomson Ross, The free will inventory: Measuring beliefs about agency and responsibility, Consciousness and Cognition, 2014, 25, 27

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Oisín Deery, Taylor Davis, Jasmine Carey, The Free-Will Intuitions Scale and the question of natural compatibilism, Philosophical Psychology, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Jason Turner, (Metasemantically) Securing Free Will, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2013, 91, 2, 295

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Nadia Chernyak, Tamar Kushnir, Katherine M. Sullivan, Qi Wang, A Comparison of American and Nepalese Children's Concepts of Freedom of Choice and Social Constraint, Cognitive Science, 2013, 37, 7
  11. 11
    Adina L. Roskies, Bertram F. Malle, A Strawsonian look at desert, Philosophical Explorations, 2013, 16, 2, 133

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    GUNNAR BJöRNSSON, KARL PERSSON, A Unified Empirical Account of Responsibility Judgments, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2013, 87, 3
  13. 13
    Adam Feltz, Melissa Millan, An error theory for compatibilist intuitions, Philosophical Psychology, 2013, 1

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    F. Krueger, M. Hoffman, H. Walter, J. Grafman, An fMRI investigation of the effects of belief in free will on third-party punishment, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2013,

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Peter Schulte, Beyond Verbal Disputes: The Compatibilism Debate Revisited, Erkenntnis, 2013,

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Hanno Sauer, Tom Bates, Chairmen, Cocaine, and Car Crashes: The Knobe Effect as an Attribution Error, The Journal of Ethics, 2013, 17, 4, 305

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Takumi Watanabe, Manami Okada, Maho Sakai, Koji Ikeya, Kaori Karasawa, Changing attribution processes by belief in free will, Journal of Human Environmental Studies, 2013, 11, 1, 59

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    John Bengson, Experimental Attacks on Intuitions and Answers, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2013, 86, 3
  19. 19
    Jessica Brown, Experimental Philosophy, Contextualism and SSI, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2013, 86, 2
  20. 20
    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Saeideh Heshmati, Deanna Kaplan, Shaun Nichols, FOLK RETRIBUTIVISM AND THE COMMUNICATION CONFOUND, Economics and Philosophy, 2013, 29, 02, 235

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Florian Cova, Frankfurt-Style Cases User Manual: Why Frankfurt-Style Enabling Cases Do Not Necessitate Tech Support, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2013,

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Mairi Levitt, Genes, environment and responsibility for violent behavior: “Whatever genes one has it is preferable that you are prevented from going around stabbing people”, New Genetics and Society, 2013, 32, 1, 4

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Steve Clarke, Intuitions as Evidence, Philosophical Expertise and the Developmental Challenge, Philosophical Papers, 2013, 42, 2, 175

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Renia Gasparatou, Naturalising Austin, Acta Analytica, 2013, 28, 3, 329

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Adam Corner, Ulrike Hahn, Normative theories of argumentation: are some norms better than others?, Synthese, 2013, 190, 16, 3579

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Adam Feltz, Pereboom and premises: Asking the right questions in the experimental philosophy of free will, Consciousness and Cognition, 2013, 22, 1, 53

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Shirley M. Ogletree, Jennifer A. Covington, Richard L. Archer, PRAISEWORTHINESS: PREDICTORS OF POSITIVE INTERPERSONAL JUDGMENTS1,2, Psychological Reports, 2013, 112, 3, 913

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Shirley M. Ogletree, Jennifer A. Covington, Richard L. Archer, PRAISEWORTHINESS: PREDICTORS OF POSITIVE INTERPERSONAL JUDGMENTS1,2, Psychological Reports, 2013, 130729135325001

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Adam Feltz, Edward Cokely, Predicting Philosophical Disagreement, Philosophy Compass, 2013, 8, 10
  30. 30
    Laura W. Ekstrom, Rational Abilities and Responsibility, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2013, 86, 2
  31. 31
    Dana Kay Nelkin, Replies to critics, Philosophical Studies, 2013, 163, 1, 123

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Felipe Brigard, William J. Brady, The Effect of What We Think may Happen on our Judgments of Responsibility, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2013, 4, 2, 259

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Billy Dunaway, Anna Edmonds, David Manley, The Folk Probably do Think What you Think They Think, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2013, 91, 3, 421

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    David Rose, Shaun Nichols, The Lesson of Bypassing, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2013, 4, 4, 599

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    C. D. Brewer, Jessica Morgan Gascoigne, The Metaphysical Assumptions Required for Political Autonomy, AJOB Neuroscience, 2013, 4, 4, 67

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Jeremy Evans, The moral psychology of determinism, Philosophical Psychology, 2013, 26, 5, 639

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    J. M. Pierre, The neuroscience of free will: implications for psychiatry, Psychological Medicine, 2013, 1

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Karl Persson, The right perspective on responsibility for ill health, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2013, 16, 3, 429

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Nadia Chernyak, Tamar Kushnir, The Self as a Moral Agent: Preschoolers Behave Morally, But Believe in the Freedom to Do Otherwise, Journal of Cognition and Development, 2013, 130326081358006

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Jennifer Wright, Tracking instability in our philosophical judgments: Is it intuitive?, Philosophical Psychology, 2013, 26, 4, 485

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Jeanine Weekes Schroer, Robert Schroer, Two Potential Problems with Philosophical Intuitions: Muddled Intuitions and Biased Intuitions, Philosophia, 2013, 41, 4, 1263

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    S. Lloyd, A Turing test for free will, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2012, 370, 1971, 3597

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    David J. Frost, Alexander, Joshua. Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction, Philosophia, 2012, 40, 4, 903

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Sebastian Lutz, Artificial language philosophy of science, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2012, 2, 2, 181

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Joshua Knobe, Wesley Buckwalter, Shaun Nichols, Philip Robbins, Hagop Sarkissian, Tamler Sommers, Experimental Philosophy, Annual Review of Psychology, 2012, 63, 1, 81

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Eric Mandelbaum, David Ripley, Explaining the Abstract/Concrete Paradoxes in Moral Psychology: The NBAR Hypothesis, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2012, 3, 3, 351

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Fiery Cushman, Joshua D. Greene, Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure, Social Neuroscience, 2012, 7, 3, 269

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Joshua Shepherd, Free will and consciousness: Experimental studies, Consciousness and Cognition, 2012, 21, 2, 915

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Eddy Nahmias, Free will and responsibility, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2012, 3, 4
  50. 50
    Steven Penney, Impulse control and criminal responsibility: Lessons from neuroscience, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2012, 35, 2, 99

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Florian Cova, Maxime Bertoux, Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, Bruno Dubois, Judgments about moral responsibility and determinism in patients with behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: Still compatibilists, Consciousness and Cognition, 2012, 21, 2, 851

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Kurt Gray, Liane Young, Adam Waytz, Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality, Psychological Inquiry, 2012, 23, 2, 101

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    J.F. Christensen, A. Gomila, Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2012, 36, 4, 1249

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    S. Matthew Liao, Alex Wiegmann, Joshua Alexander, Gerard Vong, Putting the trolley in order: Experimental philosophy and the loop case, Philosophical Psychology, 2012, 25, 5, 661

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Gunnar Björnsson, Karl Persson, The Explanatory Component of Moral Responsibility, Noûs, 2012, 46, 2
  56. 56
    Kurt Gray, Chelsea Schein, Two Minds Vs. Two Philosophies: Mind Perception Defines Morality and Dissolves the Debate Between Deontology and Utilitarianism, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2012, 3, 3, 405

    CrossRef

  57. 57
    Tamar Kushnir, Rational Constructivism in Cognitive Development, 2012,

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    S. Nichols, Experimental Philosophy and the Problem of Free Will, Science, 2011, 331, 6023, 1401

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    HAGOP SARKISSIAN, JOHN PARK, DAVID TIEN, JENNIFER COLE WRIGHT, JOSHUA KNOBE, Folk Moral Relativism, Mind & Language, 2011, 26, 4
  60. 60
    Jeffrey P. Ebert, Daniel M. Wegner, Mistaking randomness for free will, Consciousness and Cognition, 2011, 20, 3, 965

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Brandon Warmke, Moral Responsibility Invariantism, Philosophia, 2011, 39, 1, 179

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Eric Schulz, Edward T. Cokely, Adam Feltz, Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the expertise defense, Consciousness and Cognition, 2011, 20, 4, 1722

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Liane Young, Jonathan Phillips, The paradox of moral focus, Cognition, 2011, 119, 2, 166

    CrossRef

  64. 64
    Bradley M. Appelhans, Matthew C. Whited, Kristin L. Schneider, Sherry L. Pagoto, Time to Abandon the Notion of Personal Choice in Dietary Counseling for Obesity?, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2011, 111, 8, 1130

    CrossRef

  65. 65
    Joshua Alexander, Ronald Mallon, Jonathan M. Weinberg, Accentuate the Negative, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2010, 1, 2, 297

    CrossRef

  66. 66
    Adam Waytz, Kurt Gray, Nicholas Epley, Daniel M. Wegner, Causes and consequences of mind perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010, 14, 8, 383

    CrossRef

  67. 67
    Finn Spicer, Cultural Variations in Folk Epistemic Intuitions, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2010, 1, 4, 515

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    Adam Feltz, Chris Zarpentine, Do you know more when it matters less?, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 5, 683

    CrossRef

  69. 69
    Tamler Sommers, Experimental Philosophy and Free Will, Philosophy Compass, 2010, 5, 2
  70. 70
    Andrew E. Monroe, Bertram F. Malle, From Uncaused Will to Conscious Choice: The Need to Study, Not Speculate About People’s Folk Concept of Free Will, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2010, 1, 2, 211

    CrossRef

  71. 71
    Joachim Horvath, How (not) to react to experimental philosophy, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 4, 447

    CrossRef

  72. 72
    Shaun Nichols, Michael Bruno, Intuitions about personal identity: An empirical study, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 3, 293

    CrossRef

  73. 73
    Chrisoula Andreou, Moral psychology (ethics), Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2010, 1, 4
  74. 74
    Jennifer Cole Wright, On intuitional stability: The clear, the strong, and the paradigmatic, Cognition, 2010, 115, 3, 491

    CrossRef

  75. 75
    Jens Kipper, Philosophers and grammarians, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 4, 511

    CrossRef

  76. 76
    Jonathan Livengood, Justin Sytsma, Adam Feltz, Richard Scheines, Edouard Machery, Philosophical temperament, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 3, 313

    CrossRef

  77. 77
    Thomas Grundmann, Some hope for intuitions: A reply to Weinberg, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 4, 481

    CrossRef

  78. 78
    Frank C. Keil, The Feasibility of Folk Science, Cognitive Science, 2010, 34, 5
  79. 79
    Adam Feltz, Edward T. Cokely, Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism, Consciousness and Cognition, 2009, 18, 1, 342

    CrossRef

  80. 80
    Karola Stotz, Philosophy in the trenches: from naturalized to experimental philosophy (of science), Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2009, 40, 2, 225

    CrossRef

  81. 81
    Neil Levy, Michael McKenna, Recent Work on Free Will and Moral Responsibility, Philosophy Compass, 2009, 4, 1
  82. 82
    Felipe Brigard, Eric Mandelbaum, David Ripley, Responsibility and the Brain Sciences, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2009, 12, 5, 511

    CrossRef

  83. 83
    Manuel Vargas, Revisionism about free will: a statement & defense, Philosophical Studies, 2009, 144, 1, 45

    CrossRef

  84. 84
    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Trevor Kvaran, Eddy Nahmias, Temperament and intuition: A commentary on Feltz and Cokely, Consciousness and Cognition, 2009, 18, 1, 351

    CrossRef

  85. 85
    Fiery Cushman, Liane Young, The Psychology of Dilemmas and the Philosophy of Morality, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2009, 12, 1, 9

    CrossRef

  86. 86
    ELISABETH CAMP, Two Varieties of Literary Imagination: Metaphor, Fiction, and Thought Experiments, Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 2009, 33, 1
  87. 87
    Shaun Nichols, AFTER INCOMPATIBILISM: A NATURALISTIC DEFENSE OF THE REACTIVE ATTITUDES, Philosophical Perspectives, 2007, 21, 1