Article first published online: 31 MAY 2010
© 2010 The Author. Journal compilation © 2010 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
Volume 91, Issue 2, pages 229–259, June 2010
How to Cite
MOUSAVIAN, S. N. (2010), NEO-MEINONGIAN NEO-RUSSELLIANS. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91: 229–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01366.x
- Issue published online: 31 MAY 2010
- Article first published online: 31 MAY 2010
Neo-Russellianism, which incorporates both Millianism (with regard to proper names) and the thesis of singular Russellian propositions, has widely been defended after the publication of Kripke's Naming and Necessity. The view, however, encounters various problems regarding empty names, names that do not have semantic referents. Nathan Salmon and Scott Soames have defended neo-Russellianism against such problems in a novel way; to account for various intuitions of competent and rational speakers regarding utterances of sentences containing empty names, Salmon and Soames appeal neither to entities similar to Fregean senses, e.g. propositional guises or modes of presentation, nor to Gricean implicatures. In this paper, however, I argue that their view slips into neo-Meinongianism; it is committed to nonexistent objects, assigns various properties to them, and allows quantifiers range over such entities. This, I conclude, makes Salmon and Soames' view less appealing, if not implausible.