1468-0114/asset/PAPQ_centre.gif?v=1&s=e84ad797c41b896ac6e6cd4fc5a4a6abb1f43e79)
NO CLOSURE ON SKEPTICISM
Article first published online: 2 NOV 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01405.x
© 2011 The Authors. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly © 2011 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
AVNUR, Y., BRUECKNER, A. and BUFORD, C. T. (2011), NO CLOSURE ON SKEPTICISM. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92: 439–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01405.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 2 NOV 2011
- Article first published online: 2 NOV 2011
Abstract
This article is a response to an important objection that Sherrilyn Roush has made to the standard closure-based argument for skepticism, an argument that has been studied over the past couple of decades. If Roush's objection is on the mark, then this would be a quite significant finding. We argue that her objection fails.