We would like to thank John Dinardo, David Lee, Gary Solon, a co-editor, three anonymous referees, and numerous seminar participants for useful comments and suggestions. We are grateful to John Easton, Joseph Hahn, Dan Bugler, Jack Harnedy, Amy Nowell, Frank Spoto, and John Quane for assistance in collecting the data, and to Wei Ha, Sara Lalumia, John David LaRock, and Patrick Walsh for excellent research assistance. The National Science Foundation provided research support. All remaining errors are our own.
The Effect of School Choice on Participants: Evidence from Randomized Lotteries
Article first published online: 7 SEP 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00702.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A. and Levitt, S. (2006), The Effect of School Choice on Participants: Evidence from Randomized Lotteries. Econometrica, 74: 1191–1230. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00702.x
- †
We would like to thank John Dinardo, David Lee, Gary Solon, a co-editor, three anonymous referees, and numerous seminar participants for useful comments and suggestions. We are grateful to John Easton, Joseph Hahn, Dan Bugler, Jack Harnedy, Amy Nowell, Frank Spoto, and John Quane for assistance in collecting the data, and to Wei Ha, Sara Lalumia, John David LaRock, and Patrick Walsh for excellent research assistance. The National Science Foundation provided research support. All remaining errors are our own.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 SEP 2006
- Article first published online: 7 SEP 2006
- Manuscript received November, 2003; final revision received April, 2006.
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- School choice;
- randomized lottery;
- student outcomes
School choice has become an increasingly prominent strategy for enhancing academic achievement. To evaluate the impact on participants, we exploit randomized lotteries that determine high school admission in the Chicago Public Schools. Compared to those students who lose lotteries, students who win attend high schools that are better in a number of dimensions, including peer achievement and attainment levels. Nonetheless, we find little evidence that winning a lottery provides any systematic benefit across a wide variety of traditional academic measures. Lottery winners do, however, experience improvements on a subset of nontraditional outcome measures, such as self-reported disciplinary incidents and arrest rates.

1468-0262/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=2354090f3c3edb76f7671a0522004359de7605e9)
1468-0262/asset/ECTA_centre.gif?v=1&s=0033482be8fb6a261a39223ed9b6d1ddf8b0bbea)
