LACK OF RIGOUR IN DEFENDING FAIRTRADE: SOME IMPORTANT CLARIFICATIONS OF A DISTORTING ACCOUNT – A REPLY TO PETER GRIFFITHS
Article first published online: 7 JUN 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2010.02011.x
© 2010 The Author. Journal compilation © Institute of Economic Affairs 2010. Published by Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
Additional Information
How to Cite
Smith, A. M. (2010), LACK OF RIGOUR IN DEFENDING FAIRTRADE: SOME IMPORTANT CLARIFICATIONS OF A DISTORTING ACCOUNT – A REPLY TO PETER GRIFFITHS. Economic Affairs, 30: 50–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2010.02011.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 JUN 2010
- Article first published online: 7 JUN 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Fairtrade;
- Fair Trade;
- co-operatives;
- ethical trading
Peter Griffiths claims to have undermined defensive accounts of Fairtrade by highlighting a lack of rigour in their methodology and textual construction. However, inter alia he has significantly distorted the meaning and relevance of a variety of contributions, not least that literature which he accuses others of failing to acknowledge.

1468-0270/asset/ECAF_left.gif?v=1&s=9013585a5bfc3b0302b13627cedb101cc0b4fe37)
1468-0270/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=f8938ea7ddcda0813b2cd3b49c26f62050800541)