SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alesina, A. and Rosenthal, H. (1995). Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Aragonés, E. and Palfrey, T. (2002). ‘Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 103, pp. 13161.
  • Baer, K.S. and Cherny, A. (2006). ‘Swing ideas, not swing voters’, The Democratic Strategist, available at http://www.thedemocraticstrategist.org/premiere/baercherny.php.
  • Bernhardt, D. and Ingberman, D. (1985). ‘Candidate reputations and the ‘‘incumbency effect’’', Journal of Public Economics, vol. 27(1), pp. 4767.
  • Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1997). ‘An economic model of representative democracy’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112(1), pp. 85114.
  • Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Caillaud, B. and Tirole, J. (1999). ‘Party governance and ideological bias’, European Economic Review, vol. 43(4-6), pp. 77989.
  • Caillaud, B. and Tirole, J. (2002). ‘Parties as political intermediaries’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117(4), pp. 145389.
  • Calvert, R. (1985). ‘Robustness of the multidimensional voting model: candidates's motivations, uncertainty and convergence’, American Political Science Review, vol. 29(1), pp. 6995.
  • Castanheira, M. (2003). ‘Why vote for losers?’, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 1(5), pp. 120738.
  • Castanheira, M., Crutzen, B. and Sahuguet, N. (2005). ‘Party governance and political competition with an application to the American direct primary’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4890.
  • Downs, A. (1957). ‘An economic theory of political action’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 65, pp. 13550.
  • Ferejohn, J. (1986). ‘Incumbent performance and electoral control’, Public Choice, vol. 50, pp. 526.
  • Galston, W.A. and Kamarck, E.C. (2005). The Politics of Polarization, Washington: Third Way.
  • Groseclose, T. (2001). ‘A model of candidate location when one candidate has a quality advantage’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 45(4), pp. 86286.
  • Guesnerie, R. and Laffont, J.-J. (1984). ‘A complete solution to a class of principal-agent problems with an application to the control of a self-managed firm’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 25, pp. 32969.
  • Holmström, B. (1999). ‘Managerial incentive problems: a dynamic perspective’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 66(1), pp. 16982.
    Direct Link:
  • Kartik, N. and McAfee, R.P. (2007). ‘Signaling character in electoral competition’, American Economic Review, vol. 97(3), pp. 85270.
  • Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (1986). ‘Using cost observation to regulate firms’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94(3), pp. 61441.
  • Larcinese, V. (2007). ‘The instrumental voter goes to the news-agent: demand for information, marginality and the media’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 19(3), pp. 24976.
  • McCarty, N., Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • Palfrey, T. (1984). ‘Spatial equilibrium with entry’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 51(1), pp. 13956.
  • Persson, T., Roland, G. and Tabellini, G. (1997). ‘Separation of powers and political accountability’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112(4), pp. 1163202.
  • Persson, T., Roland, G. and Tabellini, G. (1998). ‘Towards micropolitical foundations of public finance’, European Economic Review, vol. 42, pp. 68594.
  • Persson, T., and Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1991). ‘Patterns of congressional voting’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 35, pp. 22878.
  • Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rivière, A. (2000). ‘Citizen candidacy, party formation and Duverger's law’, Royal Holloway, mimeo.
  • Roemer, J. (1997). ‘Political–economic equilibrium when parties represent constituents: the unidimensional case’, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 14(4), pp. 479502.
  • Roemer, J. (2001). Political Competition. Theory and Applications, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press .
  • Rogoff, K. (1990). ‘Equilibrium political budget cycles’, American Economic Review 80(1), pp. 2136.
  • Stokes, D. (1963). ‘Spatial models of political competition’, American Political Science Review, vol. 57(2), pp. 36877.
  • Strömberg, D. (2004a). ‘Radio's impact on public spending’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119(1), pp. 189221.
  • Strömberg, D. (2004b). ‘Mass media competition, political competition, and public policy’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 71(1), pp. 26584.
    Direct Link:
  • Wittman, D. (1983). ‘Candidate motivation: a synthesis of alternatives’, American Political Science Review, vol. 77, pp. 14257.