Some of the results in this article appeared in an earlier paper entitled ‘Caring and sharing’ which should now be considered superseded. Browning thanks the Danish National Research Foundation for support through its grant to CAM. Lechene acknowledges funding under ESRC Research Fellowship RES-063-27-0002. We thank Ian Preston and two referees for comments.
Distributional Effects in Household Models: Separate Spheres and Income Pooling*
Article first published online: 14 OCT 2009
© The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2009
The Economic Journal
Volume 120, Issue 545, pages 786–799, June 2010
How to Cite
Browning, M., Chiappori, P.-A. and Lechene, V. (2010), Distributional Effects in Household Models: Separate Spheres and Income Pooling. The Economic Journal, 120: 786–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02311.x
- Issue published online: 1 JUN 2010
- Article first published online: 14 OCT 2009
- Submitted: 25 April 2007 Accepted: 3 March 2009
We derive distributional effects for a non-cooperative alternative to the unitary model of household behaviour. We consider the Nash equilibria of a voluntary contributions to public goods game. Our main result is that, in general, the two partners either choose to contribute to different public goods or they contribute to at most one common good. The former case corresponds to the separate spheres case of Lundberg and Pollak (1993). The second outcome yields (local) income pooling. A household will be in different regimes depending on the distribution of income within the household. Any bargaining model with this non-cooperative case as a breakdown point will inherit the local income pooling. We conclude that targeting benefits such as child benefits to one household member may not always have an effect on outcomes.