This article was developed from the Frank Hahn Lecture, delivered at the Royal Economic Society Meeting in spring 2009. We acknowledge terrific research support from Kyle Chauvin. We are grateful for the advice of Effi Benmelech, Alan Blinder, Emmanuel Farhi, Benjamin Friedman, Edward Glaeser, Owen Lamont, Jaewoo Lee, Andrei Shleifer, Jeremy Stein, Luis Viceira and participants at the Royal Economic Society Meeting in 2009. Laibson acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation (DMS-0527518) and the National Institute on Aging (R01-AG-021650, R01-AG-1665, P30-AG-012810).
Capital Flows, Consumption Booms and Asset Bubbles: A Behavioural Alternative to the Savings Glut Hypothesis*
Article first published online: 6 MAY 2010
© The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2010
The Economic Journal
Volume 120, Issue 544, pages 354–374, May 2010
How to Cite
Laibson, D. and Mollerstrom, J. (2010), Capital Flows, Consumption Booms and Asset Bubbles: A Behavioural Alternative to the Savings Glut Hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 120: 354–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02363.x
- Issue published online: 6 MAY 2010
- Article first published online: 6 MAY 2010
Bernanke (2005) hypothesised that a ‘global savings glut’ was causing large trade imbalances. However, we show that the global savings rates did not show a robust upward trend during the relevant period. Moreover, if there had been a global savings glut there should have been a large investment boom in the countries that imported capital. Instead, those countries experienced consumption booms. National asset bubbles explain the international imbalances. The bubbles raised consumption, resulting in large trade deficits. In a sample of 18 OECD countries plus China, movements in home prices alone explain half of the variation in trade deficits.