SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Asquith, P. (1983). ‘Merger bids, uncertainty and stockholder returns’, Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp. 5183.
  • Atanasov, V. (2000). ‘Valuations of large blocks of shares and the private benefits of control’, mimeo, Pennsylvania State University.
  • Banerjee, S., Leleux, B. and Vermaelen, T. (1997). ‘Large shareholdings and corporate control: An analysis of stake purchases by French holding companies’, European Financial Management, 3, pp. 2243.
  • Barclay, M. J. (1992). ‘The law and large block trades’, Journal of Law and Economics, XXXV October), pp. 265294.
  • Barclay, M. J. and Holderness, C. G. (1989). ‘Private benefits from control of public corporations’, Journal of Financial Economics, 25, pp. 371395.
  • Barclay, M. J. and Holderness, C. G. (1991). ‘Negotiated block trades and corporate control’, Journal of Finance, 46, pp. 861878.
  • Berglof, E. and Pajuste, A. (2003). ‘Corporate governance in Central and Eastern Europe’, in Cornelius, P. and Kogut, B. (eds.), Global Competitiveness and Corporate Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 267302.
  • Brezigar, A., Gregoric, A. and Zajc, K. (2007). ‘Firm of private value: What is behind the creation of multiple blockholder structures?’ Paper presented at the 33rd EFA Meeting in Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Brown, S.J. and Warner, J.B. (1985). ‘Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies’, Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 331.
  • Burkart, M., Gromb, D. and Panunzi, F. (2000). ‘Agency conflicts in public and negotiated transfers of corporate control’, Journal of Finance, 55, pp. 647677.
  • Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W. and MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Coffee, J. (1998). ‘Inventing a corporate monitor for transition economies: The uncertain lessons from the Czech and Polish Experience’, in Hopt, K. et al . (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance. The State of Art and Emerging Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67139.
  • Corrado, C. J. (1989). ‘A nonparametic test for abnormal security price performance in event studies’, Journal of Financial Economics, 23, pp. 385395.
  • Corrado, C. J. and Zivney, T. L. (1992). ‘The specification and power of the sign test in event study hypothesis tests using daily stock returns’. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, pp. 465478.
  • De Jong, F. (1996). ‘Event studies: Methodology and applications’, Lecture Notes Written for the Course ‘Empirie van Financiele Vraagstukken.
  • Domadenik, P., Prasnikar, J. and Svejnar, J. (2006). ‘Restructuring of firms in transition: Ownership, institutions and openness to trade’, RCEF Working Paper, No. 98, Ljubljana: RCEF.
  • Dyck, A. and Zingales, L. (2004). ‘Private benefits of control: An international comparison’, Journal of Finance, 59, pp. 537600.
  • Earle, J. S., Kucsera, C. and Telegdy, A. (2003). ‘Ownership concentration and corporate performance on the Budapest stock exchange: Do too many cooks spoil the goulash?’ Staff Working Paper, 03-93, Upjohn Institute, MI.
  • Eventus’, the registered trademark for the software used for conducting event studies, produced by Cowan Research L.C. In our study, we did not make use of the program, but only consulted its technical reference downloaded from the website http://www.eventstudy.com.
  • Franks, J. and Mayer, C. (2000). ‘Ownership and control of German corporations’, CEPR Discussion Papers 2898, London: CEPR.
  • Frydman, R. and Rapaczynski, A. (1993). ‘Insiders and the state: Overview of responses to agency problems in East European privatizations’, Economics of Transition, 1, pp. 3959.
  • Giacomelli, J., Gregoric, A. and Prasnikar, J. (2006). ‘Ekonomski vidiki korupcije v tranzicijskih drzavah’, in Prasnikar, J. (ed.), Priloznosti Financnega Sektorja v Tranzicijskih Drzavah, Finance: Ljubljana, pp. 235253.
  • Gregoric, A. (2003). ‘Corporate governance in Slovenia: An international perspective’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Slovenia: Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana.
  • Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E. and Svejnar, J. (2004). ‘Ownership, control and corporate performance after large-scale privatization’, William Davidson Institute Working Paper, 652, Cambridge, MA: WDI.
  • Hart, O. (1995). Firms Contracts and Financial Structure, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2000). ‘Tunnelling’, NBER Working Paper, 7523, Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  • Knezevic, L. (2006). ‘The influence of corporate governance mechanisms on management turnover: The case of Slovenia’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Slovenia: Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana.
  • Koke, J. and Renneboog, L. (2003). ‘Do corporate control and product market competition lead to stronger productivity growth? Evidence from market-oriented and blockholder-based governance regimes’, ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, No. 14/2003, Tilberg University, Netherlands: ECGI.
  • Mikkelson, W. H. and Regassa, H. (1991). ‘Premiums paid in block transactions’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 12, pp. 511517.
  • Milnor, J. W. and Shapley, L. S. (1978). ‘Values of large games II: Oceanic games’, Mathematics of Operations Research, 3, pp. 290307.
  • Mramor, D. and Jasovic, B. (2004). ‘Capital market development’, in Mrak, M. et al . (eds.), Slovenia. From Yugoslavia to the European Union, Washington DC: The World Bank, pp. 276292.
  • Nicodano, G. and Sembelli, A. (2004). ‘Private benefits, block transaction premiums and ownership structure’, International Review of Financial Analysis, 13, pp. 227244.
  • Pahor, M. (2003). ‘Causes and consequences of companies’ activity in an ownership network’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Ljubljana, 230 p.
  • Patell, J. M. (1976). ‘Corporate forecasts for earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical test’, Journal of Accounting Research, 14, pp. 246276.
  • Prasnikar, J. and Gregoric, A. (2002). ‘The influence of workers’ participation on the power of management in transitional countries. The case of Slovenia’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73(2), pp. 269297.
  • Prasnikar, J. and Svejnar, J. (1998). ‘Investment and wages in the Slovenian firms during the transition’, The William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Business School, Working Paper, No. 184, Cambridge, MA: WDI.
  • Prasnikar, J, Ferligoj, A. and Pahor, M. (2004). ‘Building a corporate network in a transition economy: The case of Slovenia’, Post-communist Economies, 16, pp. 307331.
  • Rydqvist, K. (1998). ‘Empirical investigation of the voting premium’, Discussion Paper No. 12, Oslo: Norwegian School of Management.
  • Simoneti, M. (1999). ‘Transformation of privatization funds’, in Simoneti, M., Estrin, S. and Bohm, A. (eds.), The Governance of Privatization Funds. Experiences of the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovenia, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 92104.
  • Simoneti, M. and Gregoric, A. (2004). ‘Managerial ownership and corporate performance in Slovenian post-privatization period’, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 1/2, pp. 217241.
  • Tirole, J. (2006). Theory of Corporate Finance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Trojanowski, G. (2002). ‘Equity block transfers in transition economies: Evidence from Poland’, CEPR Discussion Paper no. 3280, London: CEPR.
  • Wright, M., Buck, T. and Filatotchev, I. (2005). ‘Corporate governance in transition economies’, in Keasey, K., Thompson, S. and Wright, M. (eds.), Corporate Governance. Accountability, Enterprise and International Comparison, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 415445.
  • Zingales, L. (1995). ‘What determines the value of corporate votes?’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, pp. 10471073.
  • Zwiebel, J. (1995). ‘Block investment and partial benefits of corporate control’, Review of Economic Studies, 62, pp. 161185.