SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ayers, M. (1974), ‘Individuals without Sortals’, The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 4: 11348.
  • Ayers, M. (1997), ‘Is “Physical Object” a Sortal Concept? A Reply to Xu’, Mind and Language, 12: 393405.
  • Campbell, J. (2002), Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Campbell, J. (2006), ‘Does Visual Reference Depend on Sortal Classification? Reply to Clark’, Philosophical Studies, 127: 22137.
  • Dickie, I. (2010), ‘The Generality of Particular Thought’, Philosophical Quarterly, 60: 50831.
  • Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M. and Freeman, E. (2002), ‘Segmentation, Attention, and Phenomenal Visual Objects’, in B.Scholl (ed) Objects and Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 6195.
  • Dummett, M. (1973), Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.
  • Dummett, M. (1981), The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy. London: Duckworth.
  • Evans, G. (1982), The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Frege, G. (1950), The Foundations of Arithmetic (trans J. L. Austin.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original publication date 1884)
  • Grandy, R. E. (2007), ‘Sortals’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2007/entries/sortals
  • Kripke, S. (1977), ‘Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2: 25576.
  • O'Craven, K. M., Downing, P. E. and Kanwisher, N. (1999), ‘fMRI Evidence for Objects as the Units of Attentional Selection’, Nature, 401: 5847.
  • Palmer, S. E. (1999), Vision Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. (2003), Seeing and Visualising: It's Not What You Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. (2007), Things and Places: How the Mind Connects with the World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Quine, W. V. (1953), ‘Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis’, in W. V.Quine, From a Logical Point of View. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Quine, W. V. (1960), Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Scholl, B. (2002), ‘Objects and Attention: the State of the Art’, in B.Scholl (ed.), Objects and Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Scholl, B. (2007), ‘What Have We Learned About Attention from Multiple Object Tracking (and vice versa)?’, in D.Dedrick and L.Trick (eds) Computation, Cognition, and Pylyshyn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Shoemaker, S. (2003a), ‘Causality and Properties’, in S.Shoemaker, Identity, Cause, and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 20633.
  • Shoemaker, S. (2003b), ‘Identity, Properties, and Causality’, in S.Shoemaker, Identity, Cause, and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23460.
  • Siegel, S. and Glanzberg, M. (2007), ‘Presupposition and Policing in Complex Demonstratives’, Nous, 40: 142.
  • Strawson, P. F. (1959), Individuals. London: Methuen.
  • Wiggins, D. (1997), ‘Sortal Concepts: a Reply to Fei Xu’, Mind and Language, 12: 41321.
  • Wiggins, D. (2001), Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Xu, F. (2007), ‘Sortal Concepts, Object Individuation, and Language’, Trends in Cognitive Science, 11: 4006.