Does head CT scan pathology predict outcome after mild traumatic brain injury?

Authors

  • M. Lannsjö,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
    2. Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gavleborg, Gavleborg, Sweden
    • Correspondence: M. Lannsjö, Rehabilitation Medicine, Sandviken Hospital, SE-81189 Sandviken, Sweden

      (tel.: +4626278529 or + 46703264259; fax: +4626255997; e-mail: marianne.lannsjo@lg.se).

    Search for more papers by this author
  • M. Backheden,

    1. Medical Statistics Unit, Department LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Search for more papers by this author
  • U. Johansson,

    1. Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gavleborg, Gavleborg, Sweden
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. L. af Geijerstam,

    1. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. Borg

    1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Rehabilitation Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Background and purpose

More evidence is needed to forward our understanding of the key determinants of poor outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). A large, prospective, national cohort of patients was studied to analyse the effect of head CT scan pathology on the outcome.

Methods

One-thousand two-hundred and sixty-two patients with MTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 15) at 39 emergency departments completed a study protocol including acute head CT scan examination and follow-up by the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire and the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 3 months after MTBI. Binary logistic regression was used for the assessment of prediction ability.

Results

In 751 men (60%) and 511 women (40%), with a mean age of 30 years (median 21, range 6–94), we observed relevant or suspect relevant pathologic findings on acute CT scan in 52 patients (4%). Patients aged below 30 years reported better outcome both with respect to symptoms and GOSE as compared to patients in older age groups. Men reported better outcome than women as regards symptoms (OR 0.64, CI 0.49–0.85 for ≥3 symptoms) and global function (OR 0.60, CI 0.39–0.92 for GOSE 1–6).

Conclusions

Pathology on acute CT scan examination had no effect on self-reported symptoms or global function at 3 months after MTBI. Female gender and older age predicted a less favourable outcome. The findings support the view that other factors than brain injury deserve attention to minimize long-term complaints after MTBI.

Ancillary