aCareer Development Fellow in Civil Procedure, Faculty of Law and University College, University of Oxford. The author would like to thank Adrian Zuckerman, Rabeea Assy and the two anonymous referees for their very helpful comments and suggestions on this paper. All errors are mine.
Legal Advice Privilege and its Relevance to Corporations
Article first published online: 7 MAY 2010
© 2010 The Author. Journal Compilation © 2010 The Modern Law Review Limited
The Modern Law Review
Volume 73, Issue 3, pages 371–398, May 2010
How to Cite
Higgins, A. (2010), Legal Advice Privilege and its Relevance to Corporations. The Modern Law Review, 73: 371–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00800.x
- Issue published online: 7 MAY 2010
- Article first published online: 7 MAY 2010
This article considers whether the rationale for legal advice privilege applies to corporations. It examines the rationale for legal advice privilege in the aftermath of the disagreement between the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords in the Three Rivers litigation, and argues that the rule of law rationale for advice privilege endorsed by the House of Lords is based largely on the needs and behavior of individuals. The paper examines the case for recognising advice privilege for corporations. Recent developments in corporate law and governance, especially in relation to directors' duties, have arguably reduced the need for a corporate privilege. Public and large private companies in particular already have sufficient incentives to obtain accurate legal advice about their affairs even without a privilege. There are also sound policy reasons for restricting the right of corporations to claim legal advice privilege given its costs to the administration of justice.