SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abraham, William J. 2003.Revelation and Natural Theology. In Alister E. McGrath and Evangelical Theology, Ed. Sung WookChung, 264279. Cumbria/Grand Rapids: Paternoster Press/Baker Academic.
  • Balashov, Yuri, and AlexRosenberg, Eds. 2002. Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings. Routledge Contemporary Readings in Philosophy, ed. PaulK. Moser. London: Routledge.
  • Boyd, Richard. 1991. On the Current Status of Scientific Realism. In The Philosophy of Science, Ed. RichardBoyd, PhilipGasper, and J. D.Trout, 195222. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Curd, Martin, and J. A.Cover, eds. 1998. Philosophy of Science: the Central Issues. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Drees, Willem. 1996. Religion, Science and Naturalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldman, Alvin I. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Laudan, Larry. 1981. A Confutation of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science 48: 1949. Reprinted in Curd and Cover (1998, 1114–35) (page references are to reprint edition).
  • Lee, Wang-Yen. 2005. Pragmatic Realism in Science and Religion. MPhil thesis., University of Cambridge.
  • McGrath, Alister E. 1998. The Foundations of Dialogue in Science & Religion. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • McGrath, Alister E. 2002. A Scientific Theology. Vol. 2, Reality. Grand Rapids: William. B. Eerdmans.
  • McMullin, Ernan. 1984. A Case for Scientific Realism. In Scientific Realism, Ed. J.Leplin, 840. Berkeley: University of California Press. Reprinted in Balashov and Rosenberg (2002, 248–80) (page references are to reprint edition).
  • Moore, Andrew. 2003. Realism and Christian Faith: God, Grammar, and Meaning. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
  • Musgrave, Alan. 1985. Realism versus Constructive Empiricism. In Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen, ed. Paul M.Churchland and Clifford A.Hooker, 197221. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Newton-Smith, William H. 1981. The Rationality of Science. London/New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Peacocke, Arthur. 1984. Intimations of Reality: Critical Realism in Science and Religion. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. Philosophical Issues in Science, Ed. W. H.Newton-Smith. London: Routledge.
  • Rescher, Nicholas. 1987. Scientific Realism: A Critical Reappraisal. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Ed. Robert EButts, v. 40. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
  • Rescher, Nicholas. 2000. Realistic Pragmatism: An Introduction to Pragmatic Philosophy. SUNY Series in Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Resnik, David. 1994. Hacking's Experimental Realism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 24: 395412. Reprinted in Curd and Cover (1998, 1169–85) (page references are to reprint edition).
  • Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Van Huyssteen, Wentzel. 1988. Experience and Explanation. The Justification of Cognitive Claims in Theology. In Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 23, no. 3: 24762. Reprinted in van Huyssteen (1997, 162–179).
  • Van Huyssteen, Wentzel. 1989. Theology and the Justification of Faith: Constructing Theories in Systematic Theology. Translated by H. F. Snijders. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
  • Van Huyssteen, Wentzel. 1996. The Shaping of Rationality in Science and Religion. In Hervormde Teologiese Studies 52, no.1. Reprinted in van Huyssteen (1997, 238–65) (page references are to reprint edition).
  • Van Huyssteen, Wentzel. 1997. Essays in Postfoundationalist Theology. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
  • Van Huyssteen, Wentzel. 1998. Postfoundationalism in Theology and Science. In Rethinking Theology and Science: Six Models for the Current Dialogue, Ed. Niels HenrikGregersen and J.WentzelVan Huyssteen, 1350. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
  • Van Huyssteen, Wentzel. 1999. The Shaping of Rationality: Towards Interdisciplinarity in Theology and Science. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
  • Van Kooten Niekerk, Kees. 1998. A Critical Realist Perspective on the Dialogue between Theology and Science. In Rethinking Theology and Science: Six Models for the Current Dialogue, Ed. Niels HenrikGregersen and J.WentzelVan Huyssteen, 15779. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
  • Watts, Fraser. 1998. Science and Theology as Complementary Perspectives. In Rethinking Theology and Science: Six Models for the Current Dialogue, Ed. Niels HenrikGregersen and J.Wentzel, Van Huyssteen, 15779. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.