Tayloring Reformed Epistemology: Charles Taylor, Alvin Plantinga and the De Jure Challenge to Christian Belief. By Deane-Peter Baker
Version of Record online: 7 APR 2009
© The author 2009. Journal compilation © Trustees for Roman Catholic Purposes Registered 2009
The Heythrop Journal
Volume 50, Issue 3, page 512, May 2009
How to Cite
Morrison, G. (2009), Tayloring Reformed Epistemology: Charles Taylor, Alvin Plantinga and the De Jure Challenge to Christian Belief. By Deane-Peter Baker. The Heythrop Journal, 50: 512. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00484_4.x
- Issue online: 7 APR 2009
- Version of Record online: 7 APR 2009
Pp. xii, 228 , Dublin , Veritas , 2007 , $90.00 .
Is Christian belief justified, rational or warranted? The search for a response is the heart of the de jure challenge. The very search itself can be perilous as it can fall into reduction, apologetics or even ‘lite’ analytic or doxastic practices. The reductive temptation is to end up answering the de facto question of whether belief in God is true. The fall into apologetics, again - another attempt to avoid the de jure challenge - is to spend more time defending one's own position to the detriment of developing an engaging epistemological and theological imagination. Lastly, the fall into ‘lite’ analytic and doxastic practice is, for example, to utilise analogies and hypothetical creations with a ‘thin’ perceptual practice. Aware of these temptations, Deane-Peter Baker invites the reader on a journey into the world of Reformed epistemology. He does this in two parts.
In Part 1, he initiates a quest to find a rational way to respond to the de jure question by way of his Reformed tradition. To this end, he deconstructs the Reformed epistemology of three eminent figures, Nicholas Wolterstorff, William Alston and Alvin Plantinga. Finding that the deontic justification approach of the ‘internalists’, Wolterstorff and Alston, are wanting in their approaches to respond to the de jure challenge of Christian belief, Baker looks to the ‘externalist’, Alvin Plantinga, for direction. Bringing to attention Plantinga's epistemic model, asserting that Christian belief is warranted, Baker alerts the reader to a key starting point to his own response to the de jure challenge, namely to the sensus divinitatis. Beyond inference and argument (thematisations), there is the disposition of a sensus divinitatis. Acting like an immediate experience of perception, a properly functioning sensus divinitatis produces ‘basic beliefs’. Theologically, this evidences a logic or ‘eyes’ of faith. Plantinga names this the ‘Aquinas/Calvin’ (A/C) Model - given that ‘a kind of natural knowledge of God’ resonates in the works of both Aquinas and Calvin. Plantinga's key insight here will prove to be crucial as Baker forms his analyses and conclusions.
In Part 2, he does something unique and commendable by setting out to bring both the Analytic and Continental traditions of philosophy together. His aim is to enhance Plantinga's A/C Model with the moral phenomenology of Charles Taylor, ‘a leading analytic exponent of Continental philosophy’. Evidently, Baker is learning from Taylor to seek a continental route to enrich the Analytic tradition of Reformed epistemology. For some this will seem like a radical trespass; for others, however, it evidences openness and boldness to reach beyond traditions and borders. Particularly, Baker's approach reveals that both the Analytic and Continental traditions need each other, especially when their own ways of doing things appear to dry up, so to speak.
Towards the aim of ‘Tayloring Reformed Epistemology’, Baker introduces the reader to the moral dimension of phenomenology through the lens of ontological language, that is to say, the necessity of having a moral life. For Taylor, such a condition must strive towards the transcendence of an ‘incomparably higher good’. And at the basis of the good is the structure and history of Christian theism. Here, in the midst of Baker's analysis, we find de-ontic, analytic claims to morality, structure and theism resonating in Taylor's ‘moral phenomenology’.
After exhausting many of Taylor's ‘interlocutors’ such as Melissa Lane, Gary Gutting and Stephen Mulhall, Baker eventually begins his own creative construction of an ‘Augmented Model’ to broach an expanded de jure thesis: ‘whether or not Christianity is true is one that need not, and indeed ought not, be taken seriously’. That is, the de jure question and challenge, for Baker, directs the quest of Reformed epistemology to the insight and discovery that the existence of God and claims of Christianity should not be reduced to ‘high standards’ of proof and thematisation; rather, it is enough to show that Christian belief is reasonable and reliable.
Baker provides the reader with a thoughtful, critical, searching and, at times, complex discussion on the epistemological foundations for Christian belief. The book nurtures a hope of realizing the importance of moral living and transcendence for Christian faith. Given the prominent place that Continental philosophy occupies in this book, not only is it a valuable introduction to the world of Analytic philosophy, but it also becomes a powerful testimony for both traditions to learn from one another.