ARTICLE
Divine Command Theory and Theistic Activism
Article first published online: 16 MAR 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2012.00752.x
© 2012 The Author. The Heythrop Journal © 2012 Trustees for Roman Catholic Purposes Registered
Additional Information
How to Cite
Rahimi, S. (2012), Divine Command Theory and Theistic Activism. The Heythrop Journal, 53: 551–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2012.00752.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 6 JUN 2012
- Article first published online: 16 MAR 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
If the divine will is not subject to any principle, and God controls all truths including moral truths, morality will be arbitrary at the deepest level. It will not be possible to offer any explanation of why God has willed certain actions rather than their contraries. Throughout the history of philosophical debate there have been many attempts to support the dependence of moral truths on God's command (or divine command theory) and at the same time to avoid this charge of arbitrariness. In the West, one such an attempt has been made by Thomas V. Morris and Christopher Menzel (, hereafter M&M), who refer to their position as theistic activism. In this paper I will discuss their view and argue that: 1) their position does not satisfy the requirements of divine freedom, and that 2) to regard moral truths as necessary and unalterable is not adequate.

1468-2265/asset/HEYJ_centre.gif?v=1&s=9dedac292bbedc53151f31ba6aff58c553f4a2ff)
