I am extremely grateful to Brady Brower, Brian Connolly, Ben Kafka, Judith Surkis, and Elizabeth Weed, whose critical suggestions pushed me beyond my own limits and made this a much better essay than it otherwise might have been. I also wish to thank Peter Loewenberg for many helpful suggestions, and Sam Moyn and Ethan Kleinberg, who invited me to give the History and Theory lecture.
THE INCOMMENSURABILITY OF PSYCHOANALYSIS AND HISTORY
Article first published online: 27 JAN 2012
© 2012 Wesleyan University
History and Theory
Volume 51, Issue 1, pages 63–83, February 2012
How to Cite
SCOTT, J. W. (2012), THE INCOMMENSURABILITY OF PSYCHOANALYSIS AND HISTORY. History and Theory, 51: 63–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00612.x
This paper is a revised version of the third History and Theory Lecture, presented on April 4, 2011, at Columbia University in New York. The History and Theory Lecture is given annually, and is jointly sponsored by History and Theory and the Consortium for Intellectual and Cultural History centered at Columbia University (http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cich/ [accessed October 26, 2011]).
- Issue published online: 27 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 27 JAN 2012
- Freudian theory;
This article argues that, although psychoanalysis and history have different conceptions of time and causality, there can be a productive relationship between them. Psychoanalysis can force historians to question their certainty about facts, narrative, and cause; it introduces disturbing notions about unconscious motivation and the effects of fantasy on the making of history. This was not the case with the movement for psychohistory that began in the 1970s. Then the influence of American ego-psychology on history-writing promoted the idea of compatibility between the two disciplines in ways that undercut the critical possibilities of their interaction. The work of the French historian Michel de Certeau provides theoretical insight into the uses of incommensurability, while that of Lyndal Roper demonstrates both its limits and its value for enriching historical understanding.