Original Article
Ruth Ellis and Public Contestation of the Death Penalty
Article first published online: 11 NOV 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2011.00691.x
© 2011 The Author; The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice © 2011 The Howard League and Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue

The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
Special Issue: Historical Perspectives on Punishment and Prisons: Representations and Realities: Edited by Helen Johnston and Michael Fiddler
Volume 50, Issue 5, pages 492–504, December 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
Seal, L. (2011), Ruth Ellis and Public Contestation of the Death Penalty. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 50: 492–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2011.00691.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 11 NOV 2011
- Article first published online: 11 NOV 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- death penalty;
- capital punishment;
- murder;
- public opinion;
- Ruth Ellis
Abstract
This article examines public reactions to the case of Ruth Ellis through an analysis of letters sent to the Home Secretary. The vast majority of these requested a reprieve, and highlighted themes such as her status as a mother, the murder as a crime of passion, David Blakely's mistreatment of her and the unfairness of applying the death penalty in her case. I argue that we need to analyse the public's views on Ruth Ellis in order to understand why her case was a pivotal one in turning the tide against capital punishment as a mandatory penalty for murder.

1468-2311/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=d7c421bad3dc8d5a4812785b0fa0b4aa9a4bd1fb)
1468-2311/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=30c9e2f45e2059eda9b41aa293c8e41d1aaadffa)