This article has been written as part of the author's ESRC Professorial Fellowship and he gratefully acknowledges the support of the ESRC. He also wishes to thank Dr Rachel Owen for research assistance.
Bringing hegemony back in: the United States and international order
Version of Record online: 13 JAN 2009
© 2009 The Author(s). Journal Compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/The Royal Institute of International Affairs
Volume 85, Issue 1, pages 23–36, January 2009
How to Cite
CLARK, I. (2009), Bringing hegemony back in: the United States and international order. International Affairs, 85: 23–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00778.x
- Issue online: 13 JAN 2009
- Version of Record online: 13 JAN 2009
Hegemony suffers from a bad press. It is currently used to refer simply to United States primacy. Thus presented, the US is considered to have been hegemonic since 1945, or at least since 1990. Instead, hegemony is presented here as a legitimate institution of international society in which special rights and responsibilities are conferred on the hegemon. No such hegemony exists at present. However, given today's constellation of power, a circumscribed US hegemony potentially has a distinctive contribution to make to contemporary international order. To map out such a hegemonic institution, this article reviews some historical precedents. It finds that, rather than uniform, these have taken a variety of forms, especially with respect to the scope of the legitimacy and constituency within which they have operated. A scheme of hegemonies—singular, collective and coalitional—is set out as a more realistic way of thinking about hegemony's present potential.