SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Araujo, L. (1998). Knowing and learning as networking. Management Learning, 29, 317336.
  • Argote, L. and Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150169.
  • Argote, L., Beckman, S.L. and Epple, D. (1990). The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36, 140154.
  • Argote, L., McEvily, B. and Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49, 571582.
  • Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Audit Commission. (2007). The Transition from CPA to CAA. London: Audit Commission.
  • Balbastre, F. and Moreno-Luzon, M. (2003). Self-assessment application and learning in organizations: a special reference to the ontological dimension. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(3), 367388.
  • Bapuji, H. and Crossan, M. (2004). From questions to answers: reviewing organizational learning research. Management Learning, 35, 397417.
  • Bate, P. and Robert, G. (2002). Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales. Public Administration, 80, 643663.
  • Baum, J.A.C. and Berta, W.B. (1999). Sources, dynamics, and speed: a longitudinal behavioural simulation of inter-organizational and population-level learning. Advances in Strategic Management, 16, 155184.
  • Beeby, M. and Booth, C. (2000). Networks and inter-organizational learning: a critical review. The Learning Organization, 7(2), 7588.
  • Benington, J. (2000). Editorial: modernisation and improvement of government and public services? Public Money and Management, 20(2), 38.
    Direct Link:
  • Benington, J. (2001). Partnership as networked governance? Legitimation, innovation, problem-solving and co-ordination. In Geddes, M. and Benington, J. (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union. London: Routledge, pp. 198219.
  • Benington, J. and Moore, M. (in press). Debating and Delivering Public Value. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bierly, P. and Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 123135.
  • Blackler, F. (1993). Knowledge and the theory of organizations – organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 863884.
  • Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16, 10211046.
  • Boaz, A., Hayden, C. and Bernard, M. (1999). Attitudes and Aspirations of Older People: Reviews of the Literature. Social Security Report no 101. Leeds: Department of Social Security.
  • Boyne, G.A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 367394.
  • Bozeman, B. and Bretschneider, S. (1994). The ‘Publicness Puzzle’ in organization theory: a test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 197224.
  • Brodtrick, O. (1998). Organizational learning and innovation: tools for revitalizing public services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64(1), 8396.
  • Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 4057.
  • Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198213.
  • Cabinet Office. (2006). The UK Government's Approach to Public Service Reform – A Discussion Paper. London: Cabinet Office.
  • Chen, C.J. (2004). The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management, 34(3), 311321.
  • Child and Faulkner. (1998). Strategies of Co-operation: Managing Alliances, Networks and Joint Ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chiva, R. and Alegre, J. (2005). Organizational learning and organizational knowledge – towards the integration of two approaches. Management Learning, 36, 4968.
  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128152.
  • Coopey, J. and Burgoyne, J. (2000). Politics and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 869885.
  • Cross, R. and Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15, 446462.
  • Crossan, M. and Berdrow, I. (2003). Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 10871105.
  • Crossan, M., Lane, H. and White, R. (1999). An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 522537.
  • Cyert, R. and March, J. (1963). A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Daft, R. and Weick, K. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 3, 546563.
  • Darr, E. and Kurtzberg, T. (2000). An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 2844.
  • Davies, H., Nutley, S. and Smith, P. (2000). What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice. Public Money and Management, 19(1), 35.
    Direct Link:
  • DeFillippi, R. and Ornstein, S. (2005). Psychological perspectives underlying theories of organizational learning. In Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1937.
  • Dekker, S. and Hansen, D. (2004). Learning under pressure: the effects of politicization on organizational learning in public bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 211230.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. London: Collier-Macmillan.
  • DiBella, A.J., Nevis, E.C. and Gould, J.M. (1996). Understanding organizational learning capability. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 361379.
  • Dixon, N. (2000). Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning – A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14, 375394.
  • Downe, J., Rashman, L. and Hartley, J. (2004). Evaluating the extent of inter-organisational learning and change through the Beacon Council Scheme. Public Management Review, 6, 531553.
  • Dyer, J. and Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345367.
  • Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A. (eds) (2005). Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Easterby-Smith, M., Burgoyne, J. and Araujo, L. (1999). Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and in Practice. London: Sage.
  • Easterby-Smith, M., Snell, R. and Gherardi, S. (1998). Organizational learning: diverging communities of practice? Management Learning, 29, 259272.
  • Edmondson, A. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: a group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13, 128146.
  • Elkjaer, B. (2005). Social learning theory: learning as participation in social processes. In Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning And Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3853.
  • Ferdinand, J. (2004). Power, politics and state intervention in organizational learning. Management Learning, 35, 435450.
  • Ferlie, E., FitzGerald, L., Wood, M. and Hawkins, C. (2005). The non-spread of innovations: the mediating role of professional groups. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 117134.
  • Ferlie, E., Hartley, J. and Martin, S. (2003). Changing public service organizations: current perspectives and future prospects. British Journal of Management, 14, S1S14.
  • Finger and Brand. (1999). The concept of the ‘Learning Organization’ applied to the transformation of the public sector: conceptual contributions for theory development in organizational learning and the learning organization. In Easterby-Smith, M., Burgoyne, J. and Araujo, L. (eds), Developments in Theory and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 130156.
  • Fiol, C. and Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803813.
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
  • Gabbay, J., Le May, A., Jefferson, H., Webb, D., Lovelock, R., Powell, J. and Lathlean, J. (2003). A case study of knowledge management in multi-agency consumer-informed ‘communities of practice’: implications for evidence-based policy development in health and social services. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 7, 283310.
  • Geiger, D., Koch, J. and Kliesch, M. (2005). Power/knowledge structures in organizations – between enabling and suppression. Paper presented at the Sixth European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Boston.
  • Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. and Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations. Management Learning, 29, 273297.
  • Ghosh, A. (2004). Learning in strategic alliances: a Vygotskian perspective. The Learning Organization, 11, 302311.
  • Gorelick, C. (2005). Organizational learning vs the learning organization: a conversation with a practitioner. The Learning Organization, 12, 383388.
  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 13601380.
  • Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109122 (Special issue).
  • Gray, A., Hartley, J. and Broadbent, J. (2005). Editorial: the state of public management: improvement and innovation. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 79.
  • Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P. and Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Millbank Quarterly, 82, 581620.
  • Hardy, C., Phillips, N. and Lawrence, T. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence: the organizational effects of inter-organizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 321347.
  • Hartley, J. (2006). Innovation and Its Contribution to Improvement: A Literature Review for Policy-Makers, Policy Advisors, Managers and Academics. London: Communities and Local Government.
  • Hartley, J. (2008). The innovation landscape for public service organizations. In Hartley, J., Skelcher, C., Donaldson, C. and Wallace, M. (eds), Managing to Improve Public Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197216.
  • Hartley, J. and Allison, M. (2002). Good, better, best? Inter-organizational learning in a network of local authorities. Public Management Review, 4, 101118.
  • Hartley, J. and Benington, J. (2006). Copy and paste, or graft and transplant? Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational networks. Public Money and Management, 26(2), 101108.
    Direct Link:
  • Hartley, J. and Downe, J. (2007). The Shining Lights? Public service awards as an approach to service improvement. Public Administration, 85, 329353.
  • Hartley, J. and Rashman, L. (2007). How is knowledge transferred between organizations involved in change? In Wallace, M., Fertig, M. and Schneller, E. (eds), Managing Change in the Public Services. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 173192.
  • Hartley, J. and Skelcher, C. (2008). The agenda for public service improvement. In Hartley, J., Skelcher, C., Donaldson, C. and Wallace, M. (eds), Managing to Improve Public Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 323.
  • Hayek, F.A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519530.
  • Haynes, P. (2005). New development: the demystification of knowledge management for public services. Public Money and Management, 25(2), 131135.
    Direct Link:
  • Hoggett, P. (2006). Conflict, ambivalence and the contested purpose of public organizations. Human Relations, 59, 175194.
  • Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: an empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15, 7081.
  • Huber, G. (1991). Organizational Learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88115.
  • Huysman, M. (1999). Balancing biases: a critical review of the literature on organizational learning. In Easterby-Smith, M., Burgoyne, J. and Araujo, L. (eds), Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 5974.
  • Inkpen, A. (2002). Learning, knowledge management and strategic alliances: so many studies, so many unanswered questions. In Contractor, P. and Lorange, F. (eds), Co-operative Strategies and Alliances. London: Pergamon, pp. 267289.
  • Inkpen, A. and Crossan, M. (1995). Believing is seeing – Joint ventures and organization learning. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 595618.
  • Inkpen, A. and Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9, 454468.
  • Inkpen, A.C. (1996). Creating knowledge through collaboration. California Management Review, 39(1), 123140.
  • Janis, I. and Mann, L. (1977). Decision-making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. The Free Press: New York.
  • Jensen, P.E. (2005). A contextual theory of learning and the learning organization. Knowledge and Process Management, 12(1), 5364.
  • Jerez-Gomez, P., Cespedes-Lorente, J. and Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 715725.
  • Kelman, S. (2005). Public management needs help. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 967969.
  • Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9, 506521.
  • Klimecki, R. and Lassleben, H. (1998). Modes of organizational learning; indications from and empirical study. Management Learning, 29, 405430.
  • Knight, L. (2002). Network learning: exploring learning by inter-organizational networks. Human Relations, 55, 427454.
  • Knight, L. and Pye, A. (2005). Network learning: an empirically derived model of learning by groups of organizations. Human Relations, 58, 369392.
  • Knoepfel, P. and Kissling-Naf, I. (1998). Social learning in policy networks. Policy and Politics, 26, 343367.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning; Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kolb, D.A. and Fry, R.E. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In Cooper, C. (ed.), Theories of Group Processes. New York: John Wiley.
  • Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21, 487513.
  • Lane, P. and Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461477.
  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
  • Lawrence, T., Mauws, M., Dyck, D. and Kleysen, F. (2005). The politics of organizational learning: integrating power into the 4I framework. Academy of Management Review, 30, 1.
  • Lee, G. and Cole, R. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: the case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14, 633649.
  • Levinthal, D. and March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95112 (Special issue).
  • Levitt, B. and March, J. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319340.
  • López, S., Peón, J. and Ordas, C. (2005). Organizational learning as a determining factor in business performance. The Learning Organization, 12, 227245.
  • Lorenzoni, G. and Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 317338.
  • Lyles, M. and Easterby-Smith, M. (2005). Organizational learning and knowledge management: agendas for future research. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 639652.
  • Mann, P., Pritchard, S. and Mummery, K. (2004). Supporting inter-organizational partnerships in the public sector. Public Management Review, 6, 417439.
  • Marquand, D. (2004). The Decline of the Public. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Martin, S. (2005). Public service improvement: current developments and future research agendas. Local Government Studies, 31, 531540 (Special issue).
  • Miller, D. (1996). A preliminary typology of organizational learning: synthesizing the literature. Journal of Management, 22(3), 485505.
  • Miner, A. and Mezias, S. (1996). Ugly duckling no more: pasts and futures of organizational learning research. Organization Science, 7, 8899.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organisations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Moore, M. (2005). Break-through innovations and continuous improvement: two different models of innovative processes in the public sector. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 4350.
  • Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 7791.
  • Naot, Y., Lipshitz, R. and Popper, M. (2004). Discerning the quality of organizational learning. Management Learning, 35, 451472.
  • National Statistics (2006). http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/pse1206.pdf (accessed February 2007).
  • Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H. and Swan, J. (2002). Managing Knowledge Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Newell, S., Edelman, L., Scarborough, H., Swan, J. and Bresnen, M. (2003). ‘Best Practice’ development and transfer in the NHS: the importance of process as well as product knowledge. Health Services Management Research, 16(1), 112.
  • Newman, J. (2001). Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage.
  • Newman, J., Raine, J. and Skelcher, C. (2000). Innovation and Best Practice in Local Government: A Research Report. London: DETR.
  • Nicolini, D. and Meznar, M. (1995). The social construction of organizational learning – conceptual and practical issues in the field. Human Relations, 48, 727746.
  • Nicolini, D., Powell, J., Conville, P. and Martinez-Solano, L. (2007). Managing knowledge in the healthcare sector: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 245263.
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 1437.
  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nutley, S. and Davies, H. (2001). Developing organizational learning in the NHS. Medical Education, 35(1), 3542.
  • Nutley, S., Davies, H. and Walter, I. (2002). Learning from the Diffusion of Innovations. Research Unit for Research Utilisation. St Andrews: University of St Andrews.
  • Pak, C. and Snell, R. (2003). Programmed, autonomous-formal and spontaneous organizational learning. British Journal of Management, 14, 275288.
  • Penrose, E.T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Pettigrew, A. (2005). The character and significance of management research on the public services. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 973977.
  • Pettigrew, A.M., Ferlie, E. and McKee, L. (1992). Shaping Strategic Change: Making Change in Large Organizations. London: Sage.
  • Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D. and Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5, 137169.
  • Polanyi, M. (1958). The Study of Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Poole, M., Mansfield, R. and Gould-Williams, J. (2006). Public and private sector managers over twenty years: a test of the ‘convergence thesis’. Public Administration, 84, 10511076.
  • Popper, M. and Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational learning: mechanisms, culture, and feasibility. Management Learning, 31, 181196.
  • Powell, W., Koput, K. and Smith Doerr, L. (1996). Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116145.
  • Prange, C. (1999). Organizational learning – desperately seeking theory? In Easterby-Smith, M., Burgoyne, J. and Araujo, L. (eds), Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization. London: Sage, pp. 2343.
  • Rashman, L. (2007). Capacity Building Through the Beacon Scheme. London: Communities and Local Government.
  • Rashman, L. and Hartley, J. (2002). Leading and learning? Knowledge transfer in the Beacon Council Scheme. Public Administration, 80, 523543.
  • Rashman, L. and Radnor, Z. (2005). Learning to improve: approaches to improving local government services. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 1925.
  • Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240267.
  • Reagans, R., Argote, L. and Brooks, D. (2005). Individual experience and experience working together: predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51, 869881.
  • Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance management, evaluation and learning in ‘Modern’ Local Government. Public Administration, 79, 297313.
  • Scarbrough, H. and Swan, J. (2005). Discourses of knowledge management and the learning organization: their production and consumption. In Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 495512.
  • Scott, J. (2000). Facilitating inter-organizational learning with information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(2), 81113.
  • Scribner, J., Cockrell, K., Cockrell, D. and Valentine, J. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning: an evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 130160.
  • Senge, P. (1990). The leader's new work: building learning organizations. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 723.
  • Shipton, H. (2006). Cohesion or confusion? Towards a typology for organizational learning research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 233252.
  • Soo, C., Devinney, T., Midgley, D. and Deering, A. (2002). Knowledge management: philosophy, processes, and pitfalls. California Management Review, 44(4), 129150.
  • Stacey, R. (2003). Learning as an activity of interdependent people. The Learning Organization, 10, 325331.
  • Stacey, R. (ed.) (2005). Experiencing Emergence in Organizations: Local Interaction and the Emergence of Global Patterns. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Storck, J. and Hill, P. (2000). Knowledge diffusion through strategic communities. Sloan Management Review, 41(2), 6374.
  • Thomas, J.B., Sussman, S.W. and Henderson, J. (2001). Understanding strategic learning: linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organization Science, 12, 331345.
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2002). Undertaking Research: Developing an Evidence-Based Approach for Management Research. Conference paper, August. Denver, CO: Academy of Management.
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207222.
  • Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13, 179190.
  • Tsoukas, H. (2005). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 410427.
  • Tsoukas, H. and Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38, 973993.
  • Turner, D. and Whiteman, P. (2006). Learning from the experience of recovery: the turnaround of poorly performing local authorities. In Martin, S. (ed.), Public Service Improvement. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 627654.
  • Van den Bosch, F., Van Wijk, R. and Volbreda, H. (2005). Absorptive capacity: antecedents, models and outcomes. In Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 278301.
  • Vera, D. and Crossan, M. (2005). Organizational learning and knowledge management: toward an integrative framework. In Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 12141.
  • Vince, R. (2000). Learning in public organizations in 2010. Public Money and Management, 20(1), 3944.
    Direct Link:
  • Vince, R. and Broussine, M. (2000). Rethinking organizational learning in local government. Local Government Studies, 26, 1530.
  • Vince, R. and Saleem, T. (2004). The impact of caution and blame on organizational learning. Management Learning, 35, 133154.
  • Weick, K. (1996). The role of renewal in organizational learning. International Journal of Technology Management, 11, 738746.
  • Yanow, D. (2000). Seeing organizational learning: a ‘cultural’ view. Organization, 7, 247268.
  • Zollo, M. and Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339351.