SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alvesson, M. (1996). Leadership studies: from procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation. Leadership Quarterly, 7(4), pp. 455485.
  • Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S. (2003). The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing ‘leadership’. Leadership Quarterly, 14, pp. 359381.
  • Astley, G. (1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, pp. 497513.
  • Badaracco, J.L. (2001). We don't need another hero. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), pp. 120126.
  • Barker, R. (2001). The nature of leadership. Human Relations, 54, pp. 469494.
  • Barnard, C.I. (1968). Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 20, pp. 3147.
  • Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.
  • Beck, A.P. (1981). A study of group phase development and emergent leadership. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, pp. 4854.
  • Beck, A.P. and Peters, L. (1981). The research evidence for distributed leadership in therapy groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31, pp. 4371.
  • Becker, H. and Useem, R.H. (1942). Sociological analysis of the dyad. American Sociological Review, 7, pp. 1326.
  • Benne, K.D. and Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, pp. 4149.
  • Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P.A. and Harvey, J.A. (2003). Distributed Leadership. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.
  • Bjork, L.G. and Blase, J. (2009). The micropolitics of school district decentralization. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, pp. 195208.
  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G. and Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: towards a multi-level model of leadership practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62, pp. 358376.
  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G. and Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: rhetoric and reality. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 37, pp. 257277.
  • Brooks, J. (2000). Labour's modernization of local government. Public Administration Review, 78, pp. 593612.
  • Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organizational Science, 2, pp. 4057.
  • Brown, M., Rutherford, D. and Boyle, B. (2000). Leadership for school improvement: the role of the head of department in UK secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, pp. 237258.
  • Brown, M.E. and Gioia, D.A. (2002). Making things click: distributive leadership in an online division of an offline organization. Leadership Quarterly, 13, pp. 397419.
  • Brown, M.M. and Hosking, D.D. (1986). Distributed leadership and skilled performance as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations, 39, pp. 6579.
  • Busher, H. (2005). Being a middle leader: exploring professional identities. School Leadership and Management, 25, pp. 137153.
  • Collinson, D. and Collinson, M. (2009). ‘Blended leadership’: employee perspectives on effective leadership in the UK further education sector. Leadership, 5, pp. 365380.
  • Currie, G., Boyett, I. and Suhomlinova, O. (2005). Transformational leadership within secondary schools in England: a panacea for organisational ills? Public Administration, 83, pp. 265296.
  • Currie, G., Lockett, A. and Suhomlinova, O. (2009). The institutionalization of distributed leadership: a ‘Catch-22’ in English public services. Human Relations, 62, pp. 17351761.
  • Dahl, R.A. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Day, C. (2005). The UK policy for school leadership: uneasy transitions. In Bascia, N., Cumming, A., Datnow, A., Leithwood, K. and Livingstone, D. (eds), International Handbook of Educational Policy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 392420.
  • Day, C. et al. (2007). The Impact of School Leadership on Pupil Outcomes: Interim Report. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership for Department for Children, Schools and Families.
  • Day, C. et al. (2009). The Impact of School Leadership on Pupil Outcomes: Final Report. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
  • Day, D.V. (2000). Leadership development: a review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11, pp. 581613.
  • Deem, R., Reed, M. and Hillyard, S. (2007). Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Denis, J.L., Lamothe, L. and Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp. 809837.
  • Drath, W.H., McCauley, C.D., Palus, C.J., Van Velsor, E., O'Connor, P.M.G. and McGuire, J.B. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, pp. 635653.
  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamaki, R.L. (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1938.
  • Ensley, M.D., Hmieleski, K.M. and Pearce, C.L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp. 217231.
  • Etzioni, A. (1965). Dual leadership in complex organizations. American Sociological Review, 30, pp. 688698.
  • Fairhurst, G.T. (2007). Discursive Leadership: In Conversation with Leadership Psychology. London: Sage.
  • Fairhurst, G.T. and Grant, D. (2010). The social construction of leadership: a sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, pp. 171210.
  • Festinger, L., Schacter, S. and Back, K.W. (1950). Social Pressure in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. New York: Harper.
  • Fitzgerald, T. and Gunter, M. (2007). Teacher Leadership: A New Myth for Our Time? Chicago, IL: AERA.
  • Follett, M.P. (1942/2003). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. London: Routledge.
  • French, J.J.R.P. and Snyder, R. (1959). Leadership and interpersonal power. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, pp. 118149.
  • Gibb, C.A. (1954). Leadership. In Lindzey, G. (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 877917.
  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.
  • Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Gleeson, D. and Knights, D. (2008). Reluctant leaders: an analysis of middle managers' perceptions of leadership in further education in England. Leadership, 4, pp. 4972.
  • Goldstein, J. (2004). Making sense of distributed leadership: the case of peer assistance and review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, pp. 173197.
  • Gordon, R.D. (2002). Conceptualizing leadership with respect to its historical contextual antecedents to power. Leadership Quarterly, 13, pp. 151167.
  • Gordon, R.D. (2010). Dispersed leadership: exploring the impact of antecedent forms of power using a communicative framework. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, pp. 260287.
  • Gosling, J., Bolden, R. and Petrov, G. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: what does it accomplish? Leadership, 5, pp. 299310.
  • Graetz, F. (2000). Strategic change leadership. Management Decisions, 38, pp. 550562.
  • Gregory, M. (1996). Developing effective college leadership for the management of educational change. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 17, pp. 4651.
  • Grint, K. (2005). Leadership: Limits and Possibilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Grint, K. (2010). The sacred in leadership: separation, sacrifice and silence. Organization Studies, 31, pp. 89107.
  • Gronn, P. (1983). Talk as the work: the accomplishment of school administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, pp. 121.
  • Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 28, pp. 317338.
  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, pp. 423451.
  • Gronn, P. (2006). The significance of distributed leadership. Educational Leadership Research, 7. http://slc.educ.ubc.ca/eJournal/Issue7/index7.html
  • Gronn, P. (2008a). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, pp. 141158.
  • Gronn, P. (2008b). Hybrid leadership. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (eds), Distributed Leadership according to the Evidence. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1740.
  • Gronn, P. (2009). Leadership configurations. Leadership, 5, pp. 381394.
  • Gronn, P. (2010). Hybrid configurations of leadership. In Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (eds), Sage Handbook of Leadership. London: Sage, pp. 435452.
  • Gunter, H. and Rayner, S. (2007a). Modernizing the school workforce in England: challenging transformation and leadership? Leadership, 3, pp. 4764.
  • Gunter, H.M. and Rayner, S. (2007b). Remodeling headteachers in England: is it the end of educational leadership? International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 11. Available at http://www.ucalgary.ca/iejll/vol11/rayner
  • Hargreaves, A. and Fink, D. (2008). Distributed leadership: democracy or delivery? Journal of Educational Administration, 46, pp. 229240.
  • Harris, A. (2005). Leading or misleading? Distributed leadership and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, pp. 255265.
  • Harris, A. (2007). Distributed leadership: conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3), pp. 315325.
  • Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership: what we know. In Harris, A. (ed.), Distributed Leadership: Different Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1121.
  • Harris, A. and Muijs, D. (2004). Improving Schools through Teacher Leadership. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Harris, A. and Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22, pp. 3134.
  • Hartley, D. (2007). The emergence of distributed leadership in education: why now? British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, pp. 202214.
  • Hartley, D. (2009). Education policy, distributed leadership and socio-cultural theory. Educational Review, 61, pp. 139150.
  • Hartley, J. and Allison, M. (2000). The role of leadership in the modernization and improvement of public services. Public Money and Management, 20, pp. 3540.
    Direct Link:
  • Haslam, S.A., Postmes, T. and Ellemers, N. (2003). More than a metaphor: organizational identity makes organizational life possible. British Journal of Management, 14, pp. 357369.
  • Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26, pp. 253267.
  • Heenan, D. and Bennis, W. (1999). Co-Leaders: The Power of Great Partnerships. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Heinicke, C.M. and Bales, R.F. (1953). Developmental trends in the structure of small groups. Sociometry, 16, pp. 738.
  • Hosking, D.M. (1988). Organising, leadership and skillful process. Journal of Management Studies, 25, pp. 147166.
  • Hulpia, H. and Devos, G. (2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35, pp. 153171.
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Iandoli, L. and Zollo, G. (2008). Organisational Cognition and Learning. New York: Idea Group Incorporated.
  • James, K.T., Mann, J. and Creasy, J. (2007). Leaders as lead learners: a case example of facilitating collaborative leadership learning for school leaders. Management Learning, 38, pp. 7994.
  • Jaques, E. (1989). Requisite Organization: The CEO's Guide to Creative Structure and Leadership. Arlington, VA: Cason Hall.
  • Jermier, J.M. and Kerr, S. (1997). Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement – contextual recollections and current observations. Leadership Quarterly, 8, pp. 95101.
  • Katz, D. and Kahn, R.L. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.
  • Katz, R.L. and Kahn, D. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
  • Kelly, S. (2008). Leadership: a categorical mistake? Human Relations, 61, pp. 763782.
  • Kerr, S. and Jermier, J.M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, pp. 375419.
  • Lakomski, G. (2008). Functionally adequate but causally idle: w(h)ither distributed leadership? Journal of Educational Administration, 46, pp. 159171.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leithwood, K. and Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of different sources of leadership on student engagement in school. In Riley, K. and Louis, K. (eds), Leadership for Change and School Reform. London: Routledge, pp. 5066.
  • Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A. and Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful School Leadership: What It Is and How It Influences Pupil Learning. Nottingham: DfES Publications.
  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (2009a). Distributed Leadership according to the Evidence. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (2009b). New perspectives on an old idea: a short history of the old idea. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (eds), Distributed Leadership according to the Evidence. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 114.
  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (2009c). What we have learned and where we go from here. In Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (eds), Distributed Leadership according to the Evidence. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 269281.
  • Leithwood, K., Steinbach, R. and Ryan, S. (1997). Leadership and team learning in secondary schools. School Leadership & Management, 17, pp. 303326.
  • Leont'ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality (tr. M.J. Hall). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Leont'ev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). Connective Leadership: Managing in a Changing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Little, J.W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91, pp. 509536.
  • Loder, T.L. and Spillane, J.P. (2005). Is a principal still a teacher?: US women administrators' accounts of role conflict and role discontinuity. School Leadership and Management, 25, pp. 263279.
  • Louis, K.S. and Marks, H. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student work in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, pp. 757798.
  • Louis, K.S., Mayrowetz, D., Smiley, M. and Murphy, J. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership. In Harris, A. (ed.), Distributed Leadership. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 157180.
  • Lumby, J. (2009). Collective leadership of local school systems: power, autonomy and ethics. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37, pp. 310328.
  • MacBeath, J., Oduro, G.K.T. and Waterhouse, J. (2004). Distributed Leadership in Action: A Study of Current Practice in Schools. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
  • Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P., Jr (1993). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: a social learning perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5, pp. 361367.
  • Maxcy, B.D. and Nguyen, T.S.o.n.T. (2006). The politics of distributing leadership: reconsidering leadership distribution in two Texas elementary schools. Educational Policy, 20, pp. 163196.
  • Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, pp. 424435.
  • McCrimmon, M. (2005). Thought leadership: a radical departure from traditional, positional leadership. Management Decision, 43, pp. 10641070.
  • McIntyre, J. (2003). Yeperenye dreaming in conceptual, geographical, and cyberspace: a participatory action research approach to address local governance within an Australian Indigenous housing association. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16, pp. 309338.
  • Mehra, A., Smith, B.R., Dixon, A.L. and Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: the network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp. 232245.
  • Meindl, J. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: a social constructionist approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6, pp. 329341.
  • Meindl, J.R., Ehrlich, S.B. and Dukerich, J.M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, pp. 78102.
  • Melnick, M.J. (1982). Six obstacles to effective team performance: some small group considerations. Journal of Sport Behavior, 5, pp. 114123.
  • Menon, M.E. (2005). Students' views regarding their participation in university governance: implications for distributed leadership in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, pp. 167182.
  • Mitra, D.L. (2005). Adults advising youth: leading while getting out of the way. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, pp. 520553.
  • Morrisey, M. (2000). Professional Learning Communities: An Ongoing Exploration. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  • Nonaka, I. and Toyama, R. (2002). A firm as a dialectical being: towards a dynamic theory of a firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, pp. 9951009.
  • Northouse, P.G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and Practice, 4th edn. London: Sage.
  • O'Toole, J., Galbraith, J. and Lawler, E. (2003). When two (or more) heads are better than one: the promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. London: Sage, pp. 250267.
  • Oduro, G.K.T. (2004). Distributed leadership' in schools: what English headteachers say about the ‘pull’ and ‘push’ factors. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Manchester, 16–18 September.
  • Osborn, R.N. and Hunt, J.G. (2007). Leadership and the choice of order: complexity and hierarchical perspectives near the edge of chaos. Leadership Quarterly, 18, pp. 319340.
  • Parry, K. and Bryman, A. (2006). Leadership in organizations. In Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. and Nord, W. (eds), Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp. 447468.
  • Pea, R.D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed Cognition: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4787.
  • Pearce, C. (2004). The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18, pp. 4757.
  • Pearce, C. and Conger, J.A. (2003a). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. London: Sage.
  • Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (2003b). All those years ago: the historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 118.
  • Pearce, C.L., Conger, J.A. and Locke, E.A. (2008). Shared leadership theory. Leadership Quarterly, 19, pp. 622628.
  • Perkins, N. (1993). Person-plus: a distributed view of thinking and learning. In Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88110.
  • Pondy, L.R. (1978). Leadership as a language game. In McCall, M. and Lombardo, M. (eds), Leadership: Where Else Do We Go? Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 8799.
  • Pye, A. and Knight, L. (2005). Network leadership: a new perspective on leadership? Paper presented at the International Conference on Studying Leadership, University of Lancaster, 12–13 December.
  • Ray, T., Clegg, S. and Gordon, R. (2004). A new look at dispersed leadership: power, knowledge and context. In Storey, J. (ed.), Leadership in Organizations: Current Issues and Key Trends. London: Routledge, pp. 319336.
  • Resnick, L.B. (1991). Shared cognition: thinking as social practice. In Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M. and Teasley, S.D. (eds), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 122.
  • Rippin, A. (2007). Stitching up the leader: empirically based reflections on leadership and gender. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, pp. 209226.
  • Robinson, V.M.J. (2009). Fit for purpose: an educationally relevant account of distributed leadership. In Harris, A. (ed.), Distributed Leadership. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 219240.
  • Rosenholtz, S.J. (1989). Teachers' Workplace: The Social Organization of Schools. New York: Longman.
  • Rosenthal, C.S. (1998). Determinants of collaborative leadership: civic engagement, gender or organizational norms? Political Research Quarterly, 51, pp. 847868.
  • Ross, L., Rix, M. and Gold, J. (2005a). Learning distributed leadership: part 1. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37, pp. 130137.
  • Ross, L., Rix, M. and Gold, J. (2005b). Learning distributed leadership: part 2. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37, pp. 224231.
  • Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed Cognition: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schein, E.H. (1988). Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Senge, P.M. (1993). Transforming the practice of management. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4, pp. 532.
  • Silins, H. and Mulford, W. (2002). Leadership and school results. In Leithwood, K. and Hallinger, P. (eds), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 561612.
  • Simkins, T. (2005). Leadership in education: ‘what works’ or ‘what makes sense’? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33, pp. 926.
  • Sinclair, A. (1992). The tyranny of a team ideology. Organization Studies, 13, pp. 611626.
  • Spillane, J.P. (2006). Distributed Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Spillane, J. and Diamond, J.B. (2007a). Distributed Leadership in Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Spillane, J.P. and Diamond, J.B. (2007b). Taking a distributed perspective. In Spillane, J.P. and Diamond, J.B. (eds), Distributed Leadership in Practice. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 115.
  • Spillane, J.P., Halverson, R. and Diamond, J.B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, pp. 334.
  • Stoll, L. and Louis, K.S. (2007). Professional Learning Communities. New York: Open University Press.
  • Storey, A. (2004). The problem of distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership & Management, 24, pp. 249265.
  • Sugrue, C. (2009). From heroes and heroines to hermaphrodites: emasculation or emancipation of school leaders and leadership? School Leadership and Management, 29, pp. 353371.
  • Sveningsson, S. and Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities: organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations, 56, pp. 11631193.
  • Timperley, H. (2005). Distributed leadership: developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, pp. 395420.
  • Torrance, D. (2009). Distributed leadership in Scottish schools: perspectives from participants recently completing the revised Scottish Qualification for Headship Programme. Management in Education, 23, pp. 6370.
  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp. 654676.
  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. and McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, pp. 298318.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Washbush, J.B. (2005). There is no such thing as leadership, revisited. Management Decision, 43, pp. 10781085.
  • Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K.H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, pp. 357381.
  • Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wheatley, M. (1994). Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Woods, P. (2004). Democratic leadership: drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7, pp. 326.
  • Woods, P.A. and Gronn, P. (2009). Nurturing democracy: the contribution of distributed leadership to a democratic organizational landscape. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37, pp. 430451.
  • Yammarino, F. and Dansereau, F. (2008). Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, pp. 135141.
  • Yeung, S.W.A., Lee, Y. and Yue, K.W.R. (2006). Multicultural leadership, sustainable total school environment. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 5, pp. 121131.
  • York-Barr, J. and Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, pp. 255316.
  • Youngs, H. (2009). (Un)critical times? Situating distributed leadership in the field. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 41, pp. 377389.
  • Yukl, G.A. (2002). Leadership in Organizations, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.