SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alvarez, J.L. and Svejenova, S. (2005). Sharing Executive Power: Roles and Relationships at the Top. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Arnone, M. and Stumpf, S.A. (2010). Shared leadership: from rivals to co-CEOs. Strategy and Leadership, 38, pp. 1521.
  • Avolio, B., Walumbwa, F.O. and Weber, T.J. (2009). Leadership: current theories, research and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, pp. 421449.
  • Avolio, B.J., Jung, D.I., Murry, W. and Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Building highly developed teams: focusing on shared leadership processes, efficacy, trust, and performance. In Beyerlein, M.M., Johnson, D.A. and Beyerlein, S.T. (eds), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 173209.
  • Baligh, H.H., Burton, R.M. and Obel, B. (1996). Organizational consultant: creating a useable theory for organizational design. Management Science, 42, pp. 16481662.
  • Balkundi, P. and Kilduff, M. (2005). The ties that lead: a social network approach to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, pp. 941961.
  • Benne, K.D. and Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, pp. 4149.
  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 3, pp. 2329.
  • Beyerlein, M.M., Johnson, D.A. and Beyerlein, S.T. (1996). Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Bion, W.R. (1961). Experiences in Groups and Other Papers. London: Routledge.
  • Blau, J.R. and Alba, R.D. (1982). Empowering nets of participation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, pp. 363379.
  • Bolden, R. and Gosling, J. (2006). Leadership competencies: time to change the tune? Leadership, 2, pp. 147163.
  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G. and Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37, pp. 257277.
  • Borgatti, S.P. and Foster, P. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, pp. 9911013.
  • Bowers, D.G. and Seashore, S.E. (1966). Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, pp. 238263.
  • Brown, M.H. (1989). Organizing activity in the women's movement: an example of distributed leadership. In Klandermans, B. (ed.), International Social Movement Research, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 225240.
  • Brown, M.H. and Hosking, D.M. (1986). Distributed leadership and skilled performance as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations, 39, pp. 6579.
  • Buchanan, D.A., Addicott, R., Fitzgerald, L., Ferlie, E. and Baeza, J.I. (2007). Nobody in charge: distributed change agency in healthcare. Human Relations, 60, pp. 10651090.
  • Burke, C.S., Fiore, S.M. and Salas, E. (2003). The role of shared cognition in enabling shared leadership and team adaptability. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 103122.
  • Burnhope, C. and Edmonstone, J. (2003). ‘Feel the fear and do it anyway’: the hard business of developing shared governance. Journal of Nursing Management, 11, pp. 147157.
  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Carson, J.B., Tesluk, P.E. and Marrone, J.A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 50, pp. 12171234.
  • Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1988). The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, pp. 639652.
  • Cox, J.F. and Sims, H.P. Jr (1996). Leadership and team citizenship behaviour: a model and measures. In Beyerlein, M.M., Johnson, D.A. and Beyerlein, S.T. (eds), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 141.
  • Cox, J.F., Pearce, C.L. and Perry, L.M. (2003). Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 4876.
  • Currie, G., Lockett, A. and Suhomlinova, O. (2009). The institutionalization of distributed leadership: a ‘Catch-22’ in English public services. Human Relations, 62, pp. 17351761.
  • Dachler, H.P. and Hosking, D.M. (1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities. In Hosking, D.M., Dachler, H.P. and Gergen, K. (eds), Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 129.
  • Denis, J.L., Lamothe, L. and Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organisations. Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp. 809837.
  • Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Cazale, L. (1996). Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity. Organization Studies, 17, pp. 673699.
  • Denyer, D. and Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In Buchanan, D.A. and Bryman, A. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage Publications, pp. 671689.
  • Drath, W. (2001). The Deep Blue Sea: Rethinking the Source of Leadership. San Francisco: Center for Creative Leadership/Jossey-Bass.
  • Drath, W.H., McCauley, C.J., Palus, C.J., Van Velsor, E., O'Connor, M.G. and McGuire, J.B. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, pp. 635653.
  • Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory and the social construction of knowledge: a story of four umpires. Organization, 7, pp. 301310.
  • Ensley, M.D., Hmielski, K.M. and Pearce, C.L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: implications for the performance of start ups. Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp. 217231.
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, pp. 117140.
  • Fletcher, J.K. (2004). The paradox of post-heroic leadership: an essay on gender, power, and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly, 15, pp. 647661.
  • Fletcher, J.K. and Kaufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership: paradox and possibility. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 2147.
  • Follett, M.P. (1924). Creative Experience. New York: Longmans Green.
  • Freeman, L.C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
  • Gavin, M., Ash, D., Wakefield, S. and Wroe, C. (1999). Shared governance: time to consider the cons as well as the pros. Journal of Nursing Management, 7, pp. 193200.
  • Gibb, C.A. (1954). Leadership. In Lindzey, G. (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, pp. 877917.
  • Gibb, C.A. (1969). Leadership. In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 4, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 205283.
  • Gnyawali, D.R. and Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, pp. 431445.
  • Gomez, L. (1997). An Introduction to Object Relations. London: Free Association Books.
  • Greenhalgh, T. and Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal, 331, pp. 10641065.
  • Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidouc, O. and Peacock, R. (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science and Medicine, 61, pp. 417430.
  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, pp. 423451.
  • Gronn, P. (2003). The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in An Era of School Reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, pp. 193206.
  • Harris, A. (2002). Effective leadership in schools facing the challenging contexts. School Leadership and Management, 22, pp. 1526.
  • Hartley, D. (2010). Paradigms: how far does distributed leadership ‘stretch’? Education Management and Leadership, 38, pp. 271285.
  • Heenan, D. and Bennis, W. (1999). Co-Leaders: The Power of Great Partnerships. New York: Free Press.
  • Heifetz, R.A. and Laurie, D.L. (1997). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), pp. 124134.
  • Heifetz, R.A. and Laurie, D.L. (1999). Mobilizing adaptive work: beyond visionary leadership. In Conger, J.A., Spreitzer, G.M. and Lawler, E.E. (eds), The Leaders Change Handbook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 5586.
  • Hirschhorn, L. (1990). The Workplace within: Psychodynamics of Organizational Life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Hodgson, R.C., Levinson, D.J. and Zaleznik, A. (1965). The Executive Role Constellation: An Analysis of Personality and Role Relations in Management. Boston, MA: Harvard University.
  • Homans, G.C. (1958). Social behaviour as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, pp. 597606.
  • Hosking, D.M. (1988). Organizing, leadership and skillful process. Journal of Management Studies, 25, pp. 147166.
  • Houghton, J.D., Neck, C.P. and Manz, C.C. (2003). Self leadership and superleadership: the heart and art of creating shared leadership in teams. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 123140.
  • Huffington, C., James, K. and Armstrong, D. (2004). What is the emotional cost of distributed leadership? In Huffington, C., Armstrong, D., Halton, W., Hoyle, L. and Pooley, J. (eds), Working Below the Surface: The Emotional Life of Contemporary Organizations. London: Karnac, pp. 6782.
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Katz, D. and Kahn, R.L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
  • Kerr, S. and Jermier, J. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 22, pp. 374403.
  • Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, pp. 99110.
  • Klein, M. (1952). Some theoretical conclusions regarding the emotional life of the infant. In Klein, M.M., Heimann, P., Isaacs, S. and Riviere, J. (eds), Developments in Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 198236.
  • Klein, M. (1959). Our adult world and its roots in infancy. Human Relations, 12, pp. 291303.
  • Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 342369.
  • Leontiev, A.N. (1981). Problems in the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress.
  • LePine, J.A. and Wilcox-King, A. (2010). Editors' comments: developing novel theoretical insight from reviews of existing theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 35, pp. 506509.
  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, pp. 3446.
  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: I. Concept, method and reality in social sciences; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, pp. 541.
  • Lewin, K. (1950). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper Bros.
  • Locke, K. and Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: structuring intertextual coherence and ‘problematizing’ in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp. 10231062.
  • Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: a social learning perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5, pp. 361367.
  • Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P. Jr (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: the external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, pp. 106128.
  • Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P. Jr (1989). Superleadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P. Jr (1991). Super Leadership: beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19, pp. 1835.
  • Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P. Jr (1993). Business without Bosses: How Self-Managing Teams Are Building High Performance Companies. New York: Wiley.
  • Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P. Jr (2001). The New Superleadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Mayo, M., Meindl, J.R. and Pastor, J.-C. (2003). Shared leadership in work teams: a social network approach. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 193214.
  • Mehra, A., Smith, B., Dixon, A. and Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in work teams: the network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp. 232245.
  • Miller, E.J. (1993). From Dependency to Autonomy: Studies in Organization and Change. London: Free Association Books.
  • Neck, C.P., Stewart, G.L. and Manz, C.C. (1996). Self-leaders within self-leading teams: toward an optimal equilibrium. In Beyerlein, M.M., Johnson, D.A. and Beyerlein, S.T. (eds), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 4365.
  • Neumann, J.E. and Hirschhorn, L. (1999). The challenge of integrating psychodynamic and organizational theory. Human Relations, 52, pp. 683695.
  • O'May, F. and Buchan, J. (1999). Shared governance: a literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 36, pp. 281300.
  • Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (2003). All those years ago: the historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 118.
  • Pearce, C.L. and Manz, C.C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: the importance of self and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34, pp. 130140.
  • Pearce, C.L. and Sims, H.P. (2000). Shared leadership: toward a multi-level theory of leadership. In Beyerlein, M.M., Johnson, D.A. and Beyerlein, S.T. (eds), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Development, Vol. 7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 115139.
  • Pearce, C.L. and Sims, H.P. (2002). The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership on the longitudinal effectiveness of change management teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6, pp. 172197.
  • Pearce, C.L., Conger, J.A. and Locke, E.A. (2008). Shared leadership theory. Leadership Quarterly, 19, pp. 622628.
  • Pearce, C.L., Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P. Jr (2008). The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: implications for research and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 19, pp. 353359.
  • Pearce, C.L., Manz, C.C. and Sims, H.P. Jr (2009). Where do we go from here? Is shared leadership the key to team success? Organizational Dynamics, 38, pp. 234238.
  • Pearce, C.L., Yoo, Y. and Alavi, M. (2003). Leadership, social work, and virtual teams: the relative influence of vertical versus shared leadership in the non-profit sector. In Riggio, R.E. and Smith Orr, S. (eds), Improving Leadership in Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 180203.
  • Petriglieri, G. and Petriglieri, J.L. (2010). Identity workspaces: the case of business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, pp. 4460.
  • Pye, A. (2005). Leadership and organizing: sense-making in action. Leadership, 1, pp. 3149.
  • Rescher, N. (1996). Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Rescher, N. (2000). Process Philosophy – A Survey of Basic Issues. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Rousseau, D.M., Manning, J. and Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Annals of the Academy of Management, 2, pp. 475515.
  • Sandberg, J. and Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18, pp. 2344.
  • Scott DeRue, D. and Ashford, S.N.J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, pp. 627647.
  • Seers, A., Keller, T. and Wilkerson, J.M. (2003). Can team members share leadership? Foundations in research and theory. In Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 77102.
  • Shondrick, S.J., Dinh, J.E. and Lord, G. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 21, pp. 959978.
  • Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W.D., Avolio, B.J. and Jung, D.I. (2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group and Organization Management, 27, pp. 6696.
  • Solansky, S.T. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14, pp. 332341.
  • Spillane, J., Diamond, J. and Jita, L. (2000). Leading classroom instruction: a preliminary exploration of the distribution of leadership practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
  • Spillane, J., Diamond, J. and Jita, L. (2003). Leading instruction: the distribution of leadership for instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, pp. 533543.
  • Spillane, J., Halverson, R. and Diamond, J.B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Research News and Comments paper available on Distributed Leadership Studies website, Northwestern University.
  • Spillane, J.D. (2006). Distributed Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Wiley.
  • Spillane, J.D., Halverson, R. and Diamond, J.B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, pp. 334.
  • Stogdill, R.M. (1950). Leadership, membership and organization. Psychological Bulletin, 47, pp. 114.
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003). Toward a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, pp. 207222.
  • Turnbull James, K., Mann, J. and Creasy, J. (2007). Leaders as lead learners: a case example of facilitating collaborative leadership learning for school leaders. Management Learning, 38, pp. 7994.
  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp. 654676.
  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp. 3567.
  • Vroom, V.H. and Yetton, P.W. (1973). Leadership and Decision-Making, rev. edn. New York: Wiley.
  • Wallace, M. and Wray, A. (2006). Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K.H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, pp. 357381.
  • Wells, L. Jr (1985). The group-as-a-whole perspective and its theoretical roots. In Colman, A.D. and Geller, M.H. (eds), Group Relations Reader 2. Washington, DC: A.K. Rice Institute, pp. 109126.
  • Whitehead, A.N. (1985). Process and Reality. New York: The Free Press (originally published in 1929).
  • Whitley, R. (1984a). The fragmented state of management studies: reasons and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 21, pp. 331348.
  • Whitley, R. (1984b). The scientific status of management research as a practically-oriented social science. Journal of Management Studies, 2, pp. 369390.
  • Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organisations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.